Galactic algorithm: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View ( | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

16 September 2020

18 May 2020

15 April 2020

17 March 2020

28 December 2019

19 December 2019

13 December 2019

  • curprev 22:1522:15, 13 December 2019 18.20.241.90 talk 8,679 bytes +23 16656 is a gross underestimate for the number of digits in a 2^(1729^12)-bit number. number. undo
  • curprev 10:4710:47, 13 December 2019 80.62.116.251 talk 8,656 bytes +35 The conversion of bits to integers is wrong, and the physical relation to bits to atoms is more approachable. The article states that the number of bits in the integer is n=2^d^12 where the efficiency kicks in when d>1728. Thus, the number of digits is log(256^4^1729), by conversion from bits to bytes, bytes to number of possible values, and values to dimensions in a 10-base system. Thus, the number of digits is only 16656, but the number of bits required to represent it is in the almost cor... undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 07:5407:54, 13 December 2019 Biggy8 talk contribs m 8,621 bytes +2 fixed formatting + grammar undo Tag: Visual edit

7 December 2019

6 December 2019

22 October 2019

18 October 2019

5 October 2019

3 September 2019

26 August 2019

18 August 2019

17 August 2019

16 August 2019

15 August 2019

14 August 2019

13 August 2019

31 July 2019

25 July 2019

15 July 2019

7 July 2019

24 May 2019

23 May 2019

22 May 2019

21 May 2019

(newest | oldest) View ( | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)