Talk:Tail recursion: Revision history

21 February 2025

• curprev 16:3916:39, 21 February 2025 Tom.Reding talk contribs m 32,295 bytes −12 -redundant class param undo Tag: AWB

27 December 2024

• curprev 20:1720:17, 27 December 2024 Cewbot talk contribs m 32,307 bytes −2 Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. (Fix Category:WikiProject banners with redundant class parameter) undo Tag: Talk banner shell conversion

28 January 2024

• curprev 18:1818:18, 28 January 2024 Qwerfjkl (bot) talk contribs 32,309 bytes +29 Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26) undo Tag: Talk banner shell conversion

9 October 2010

• curprev 19:2219:22, 9 October 2010 Blaisorblade talk contribs 32,280 bytes +213 →Should be merged with Tail call: Answer undo

23 July 2010

• curprev 07:3907:39, 23 July 2010 Tea2min talk contribs 32,067 bytes +157 →Should be merged with Tail call: I agree. undo
• curprev 01:2401:24, 23 July 2010 Blaisorblade talk contribs 31,910 bytes +472 →Should be merged with Tail call: new section undo
• curprev 00:2300:23, 23 July 2010 Blaisorblade talk contribs 31,438 bytes +554 →Article Confuses Tail Recursion with Tail Calls: Answer and fix undo

28 September 2009

• curprev 16:4816:48, 28 September 2009 Fromageestciel talk contribs m 30,884 bytes +9 →Intro undo
• curprev 16:4816:48, 28 September 2009 Fromageestciel talk contribs 30,875 bytes +1,513 →intro: Suggesting Revision to the Introduction to the Tail Recursion article undo

10 September 2009

• curprev 13:4713:47, 10 September 2009 72.93.87.3 talk 29,362 bytes +269 →C examples of tail recursion modulo cons undo Tag: excessive whitespace

10 June 2009

• curprev 12:4612:46, 10 June 2009 129.10.116.251 talk 29,093 bytes +26 →Second Scheme Example is Unnecessarily Complex undo
• curprev 12:4312:43, 10 June 2009 129.10.116.251 talk 29,067 bytes +737 No edit summary undo

28 January 2009

• curprev 12:0112:01, 28 January 2009 Yobot talk contribs m 28,330 bytes −16 Removing talk page attribution templates per Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 January 18, Replaced: {{FOLDOC talk}} → using AWB undo

15 May 2008

• curprev 14:4414:44, 15 May 2008 Not-just-yeti talk contribs 28,346 bytes +1,019 issues w/ opening paragraph undo

17 October 2007

• curprev 16:4916:49, 17 October 2007 SineBot talk contribs m 27,327 bytes +252 Signing comment by 149.63.92.58 - "Article Confuses Tail Recursion with Tail Calls" undo
• curprev 16:4716:47, 17 October 2007 149.63.92.58 talk 27,075 bytes +1,418 Article Confuses Tail Recursion with Tail Calls undo

19 September 2007

• curprev 20:2120:21, 19 September 2007 ClickStudent talk contribs 25,657 bytes +215 →Tail Recursion Distinctiveness Being Lost undo
• curprev 15:0315:03, 19 September 2007 MarSch talk contribs 25,442 bytes +135 →Tail Recursion Distinctiveness Being Lost: I've edited your version. I hope you're starting to like the intro better. undo
• curprev 12:4612:46, 19 September 2007 ClickStudent talk contribs 25,307 bytes +66 →Tail Recursion Distinctiveness Being Lost undo
• curprev 11:4411:44, 19 September 2007 ClickStudent talk contribs 25,241 bytes −220 →Tail Recursion Distinctiveness Being Lost undo
• curprev 11:3811:38, 19 September 2007 SineBot talk contribs m 25,461 bytes +287 Automatically signing comment made by ClickStudent undo
• curprev 11:3611:36, 19 September 2007 ClickStudent talk contribs 25,174 bytes +217 →Tail Recursion Distinctiveness Being Lost undo

17 September 2007

• curprev 09:4109:41, 17 September 2007 MarSch talk contribs 24,957 bytes +196 →Tail Recursion Distinctiveness Being Lost: One more thought. Perhaps the use of "iterative process" and "recursive process" (as also used in SICP) would clarify this article. undo
• curprev 09:3709:37, 17 September 2007 MarSch talk contribs 24,761 bytes +651 →Tail Recursion Distinctiveness Being Lost: my reply undo

16 September 2007

• curprev 17:3717:37, 16 September 2007 SineBot talk contribs m 24,110 bytes +265 Automatically signing comment made by ClickStudent undo
• curprev 17:3517:35, 16 September 2007 ClickStudent talk contribs 23,845 bytes +350 →Tail Recursion Distinctiveness Being Lost undo
• curprev 13:3313:33, 16 September 2007 ClickStudent talk contribs 23,495 bytes −4 →Tail Recursion Distinctiveness Being Lost undo
• curprev 13:2713:27, 16 September 2007 71.238.100.169 talk 23,499 bytes +705 →Tail Recursion Distinctiveness Being Lost undo

14 September 2007

• curprev 15:2815:28, 14 September 2007 MarSch talk contribs m 22,794 bytes +2 →Tail Recursion Distinctiveness Being Lost undo
• curprev 15:2715:27, 14 September 2007 MarSch talk contribs 22,792 bytes +250 →Tail Recursion Distinctiveness Being Lost: :I do not think your assertion in your edit to the article that general recursion can be transformed to tail-recursion is correct. But I would love to b undo
• curprev 15:0115:01, 14 September 2007 ClickStudent talk contribs 22,542 bytes +323 →Tail Recursion Distinctiveness Being Lost undo
• curprev 14:4114:41, 14 September 2007 ClickStudent talk contribs 22,219 bytes −92 →Tail Recursion Distinctiveness Being Lost undo
• curprev 14:3514:35, 14 September 2007 ClickStudent talk contribs 22,311 bytes +617 No edit summary undo

16 July 2007

• curprev 02:4702:47, 16 July 2007 Ryan Roos talk contribs 21,694 bytes +32 Assessing unassessed-importance Computer science article undo
• curprev 01:0501:05, 16 July 2007 Bgruber talk contribs 21,662 bytes +1,258 →Another mechanism undo

14 July 2007

• curprev 06:4906:49, 14 July 2007 Quuxplusone talk contribs 20,404 bytes +2,771 →Another mechanism: Observations from offline conversations with others about "instruction stack" idea; Occam's Razor applies undo
• curprev 02:5002:50, 14 July 2007 203.166.63.239 talk 17,633 bytes +2,869 Perhaps I should have written, giving an embryonic or incipient vandal enough rope - P.M.Lawrence undo

13 July 2007

• curprev 06:3606:36, 13 July 2007 Quuxplusone talk contribs 14,764 bytes +1,789 →Another mechanism undo
• curprev 05:1505:15, 13 July 2007 203.166.63.134 talk 12,975 bytes +1,761 Giving a vandal enough rope to hang himself - P.M.Lawrence undo

12 July 2007

• curprev 18:0218:02, 12 July 2007 MarSch talk contribs 11,214 bytes +1,662 →Another mechanism: Your own version is false instead, claiming the return address is not remembered. undo
• curprev 12:2912:29, 12 July 2007 203.166.63.4 talk 9,552 bytes +2,135 More to substantiate the case for reversing the undo - P.M.Lawrence undo
• curprev 11:4911:49, 12 July 2007 203.166.63.4 talk 7,417 bytes +422 Request for clarification of undo - P.M.Lawrence undo
• curprev 10:2410:24, 12 July 2007 MarSch talk contribs 6,995 bytes +190 →Another mechanism: I've undone your edit. If you want this added, then find a comprehensible source or make an edit which properly explains how this works. undo
• curprev 03:0703:07, 12 July 2007 203.166.63.4 talk 6,805 bytes +991 Another mechanism - P.M.Lawrence undo

27 April 2007

• curprev 07:5707:57, 27 April 2007 The wub talk contribs 5,814 bytes +17 move sourcetype category to talk page per discussion using AWB undo

6 February 2007

• curprev 23:2023:20, 6 February 2007 Not-just-yeti talk contribs 5,797 bytes +641 thx for the good reference. undo
• curprev 10:0710:07, 6 February 2007 MarSch talk contribs 5,156 bytes +316 →lack of mainstream compiler support: The article Euclidean Algorithm says "or using iteration (more efficient with compilers that don't optimize tail recursion)" which is correct. :For more i undo
• curprev 04:1404:14, 6 February 2007 67.135.15.12 talk 4,840 bytes +219 →lack of mainstream compiler support undo

14 December 2006

• curprev 14:3114:31, 14 December 2006 Not-just-yeti talk contribs 4,621 bytes +1,409 a couple of questions undo

22 September 2006

• curprev 08:0308:03, 22 September 2006 213.115.175.18 talk 3,212 bytes +337 Additional con undo