Content deleted Content added
→a - Clear and concise prose: Review |
→7 - Overall: Pass |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 63:
===2 - Verifiable with no original research===
====a - Reference layout====
The easiest criterion to meet. This article does {{pass}} the criterion of "Reference layout". [[User:Lazman321|Lazman321]] ([[User talk:Lazman321|talk]]) 17:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
====b - Reliable sources====
All the secondary sources are reliable and trustworthy. All the primary sources are used appropriately. This article does {{pass}} the criterion for "Reliable sources". [[User:Lazman321|Lazman321]] ([[User talk:Lazman321|talk]]) 17:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
====c - No original research====
I have performed a source check on the article and can conclude that this article has no original research. As a result, this article does {{pass}} the criterion of "No original research". [[User:Lazman321|Lazman321]] ([[User talk:Lazman321|talk]]) 23:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
====d - No copyright violations====
With a [https://copyvios.toolforge.com/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=If+Found...&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=1 copyvio] score of 16 % and the Turnitin option turning up no results, this article does {{pass}} the criterion of "No copyright violations". [[User:Lazman321|Lazman321]] ([[User talk:Lazman321|talk]]) 22:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
===3 - Broad in its coverage===
====a - Main aspects of topic====
In my source check, I detected no main aspect that was neglected. This article does {{pass}} this criterion of "Main aspects of topic". [[User:Lazman321|Lazman321]] ([[User talk:Lazman321|talk]]) 23:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
====b - Focused on topic====
At no point does this article go off-topic and talk about something else that isn't related to this game. This article does {{pass}} the criterion of "Focused on topic". [[User:Lazman321|Lazman321]] ([[User talk:Lazman321|talk]]) 22:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
===4 - Neutral===
The only section that would have to worry about this criterion (the reception section) is already fine. All opinions are clearly attributed to many critics. This article does {{pass}} the criterion of "Neutral". [[User:Lazman321|Lazman321]] ([[User talk:Lazman321|talk]]) 22:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
===5 - Stable===
For the last two months, you have been the biggest contributor to this article. Not many others have been editing this article and there is no edit war on sight. This article does {{pass}} the criterion of "Stable".
===6 - Illustrated===
====a - Proper copyright tags and fair use rationales====
The two images in this article have proper fair use rationales. This article does {{pass}} this criterion. [[User:Lazman321|Lazman321]] ([[User talk:Lazman321|talk]]) 23:08, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
====b - Relevant media====
The two images are relevant to this article. The image in the infobox is the cover art of the game. The image in the plot section is a screenshot from the game to show readers the erasing mechanic. This article does {{pass}} the criterion of "Relevant media". [[User:Lazman321|Lazman321]] ([[User talk:Lazman321|talk]]) 23:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
===7 - Overall===
I have finished this review and can now conclude that thanks to your efforts in editing this article. As a result, I believe that this has {{passed}} the GA criteria and will therefore be of GA status. Great work, [[User:PresN|PresN]]. [[User:Lazman321|Lazman321]] ([[User talk:Lazman321|talk]]) 23:48, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
| |||