User:Pythoncoder/RfA criteria: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 18:04, 31 March 2019 edit Pythoncoder (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 26,433 edits m fmt ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 19:39, 5 April 2021 edit undo Pythoncoder (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 26,433 edits tabs
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: {{user:pythoncoder/tabs}} {{essay}} Line 8 ⟶ 9: 3. 1 year / 1000 edits (more concrete version of “have a record”) ~~Remember to read the [[Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates]] page.~~ ==RfB== Line 17 ⟶ 16: ==Conclusion== RfA is a horrible and broken ~~process~~ process because it’s so hard to pass. Jimbo said adminship is “not a big deal”, but RfA has become one. Let’s change that. [[Category:User criteria for adminship]]