Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upsilon function: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
not a coincidence
Upsilon function: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Upsilon function]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}
<!--Template:Afd top
 
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
 
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Malcolmxl5|Malcolmxl5]] ([[User talk:Malcolmxl5|talk]]) 23:05, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
===[[:Upsilon function]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|Upsilon function}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upsilon function|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 July 6#{{anchorencode:Upsilon function}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
Line 10 ⟶ 15:
*'''Delete'''. Like David Eppstein, I tried and failed to find evidence of a published paper to which this refers; I do not believe one exists. Coincidentally, the creator of this article returned to WP a few days ago, after 4 years absence, to write [[Draft:Jamali_equation]], an equation apparently introduced in a paper by Jamali in May of 2021 linked on Researchgate. In other words, this article is the creation of a SPA/COI account promoting brand-new, unpublished research. --[[User:JayBeeEll|JBL]] ([[User_talk:JayBeeEll|talk]]) 21:49, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
**I think it is not coincidental: the new draft (and repeated attempts to push it into mainspace) brought attention to the earlier article. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 22:01, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
*** Ah, sure. --[[User:JayBeeEll|JBL]] ([[User_talk:JayBeeEll|talk]]) 11:03, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Search finds some upsilon functions, but none that are clearly the same as this one. Looks like Wikipedia may have the honour of being the original source for this particular gem! --[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:39, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. I've also not been able to find anything published supporting the claims in the article. &mdash; [[User:Chalst|''Charles Stewart'']] <small>[[User_talk:Chalst|(talk)]]</small> 06:06, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Likely self-promotion, and not wiki-notable. The term "upsilon function" appears occasionally in the literature, but it refers to other things (in [https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.1795 knot theory], for example). [[User:XOR&#39;easter|XOR&#39;easter]] ([[User talk:XOR&#39;easter|talk]]) 16:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. I've also tried to find sources for this, or even figure out where it was published ("suggested"), but failed. /[[User:Julle|Julle]] ([[User talk:Julle|talk]]) 13:42, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>