Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queer coding: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:36, 18 July 2021

Latest revision as of 10:44, 23 July 2021

Line 51:

*<s>'''Delete'''</s> Where are my supporters? I thought I had some traditional supporters by my side? This is unbelievable. I am like the only person in Wikipedia who tries to delete [[NPOV]] articles related to LGBT. The citations used were - 1)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxokB7sfopc 2)https://andreasdeja.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-evolution-of-jafar.html 3)https://ohmy.disney.com/movies/2015/10/13/8-things-you-didnt-know-about-aladdin/ 4)https://controlforever.com/read/queercoding-and-horror-films/ . Do you not see those citations are not valid in Wikipedia?

:Note user [[User:MjolnirPants]] noted this citation: https://www.insider.com/luca-lgbt-gay-queer-coded-2021-6 is good to be used in queer coding. If you look at [[Luca (2021 film)]], the director explicitly denied the main character isn't LGBT, then how can that citation that says Luca is LGBT and queer coded be valid? All these citations are following [[WP:SYNTH]] which is using a variety of sources to imply a suggestion that characters are queer-coded when they are not! Whatever you do do not ruin Classical Golden Age Disney. There is zero evidence that the characters Jafar and Scar are LGBT and to the extent therefore they are queer-coded. [[User:7falcon23|7falcon23]] ([[User talk:7falcon23|talk]]) 00:28, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

::*Do '''NOT''' do duplicate votes when you've already nominated the article for deletion. That is an abuse of the deletion process. There is no [[WP:SYNTH]] going on here; all of the sources provided state the concept is real and that those characters, while maybe not really LGBT, are queer-coded, and no one, as well as not the article, is stating the characters are actually LBGT, just that they have traits and characteristics that "codes" them as LGBT. Just using multiple sources is not automatically synthesis. You're not even understanding the concept of queer coding properly. [[User:HumanxAnthro|👨x🐱]] ([[User talk:HumanxAnthro|talk]]) 00:36, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

::Do '''NOT''' do duplicate votes when you've already nominated the article for deletion. That is an abuse of the deletion process. There is no [[WP:SYNTH]] going on here; all of the sources provided state the concept is real and that those characters, while maybe not really LGBT, are queer-coded, and no one, as well as not the article, is stating the characters are actually LBGT, just that they have traits and characteristics that "codes" them as LGBT. Just using multiple sources is not automatically synthesis. You're not even understanding the concept of queer coding properly. [[User:HumanxAnthro|👨x🐱]] ([[User talk:HumanxAnthro|talk]]) 00:36, 18 July 2021 (UTC)