Content deleted Content added
Creating Talk:Cochlear Limited/Talk header test based as part of this VPP proposal. |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<!-- This is a temporary file to illustrate features of a proposal at Village pump at
[[VPR#Proposal to improve customization of Template:Find sources]] and will be G7'ed
in a week or two when the WP:VPR discussion quiesces.
This is a mockup designed to elicit a particular output display, and param usage below
does not reflect how usage would look in the live template to produce this output. -->
{{Talk header/sandbox|display_title=Cochlear Limited|search_term=Cochlear Limited}}
Line 11:
{{WikiProject Medicine|category=no}}
}}
{{Annual_readership|target=Cochlear Limited}}
==neutral point of view + copyright ==
Line 23:
Is it appropriate to add some information relating to the formation of the company here. For example stating what led to the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia to fund the research work that led to the commercially available products sold today and what payback resulted? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Example3|Example3]] ([[User talk:Example3|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Example3|contribs]]) 02:30, 19 September 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Talk header test response ==
[[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]], this looks good to me! Ideally, in the final implementation, both boxes would be similarly formatted with or without an icon. [[Medtronic]] is a real-world example if you're still looking for a live page to test. - [[User:Wikmoz|Wikmoz]] ([[User talk:Wikmoz|talk]]) 16:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
: {{re|Wikmoz}}, good point. We should probably copy & move this discussion somewhere, as this is a talk subpage that is only temporary, and subject to deletion at any time. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 03:53, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
:: {{re|Mathglot}}... Feel free to delete. Would it be possible to do a trial rollout of the initial solution so we can start kicking the tires in the real world? We had consensus to move forward. We could then use [[Medtronic]] to test the stacked RS link sets. I can kick off a conversation on a template talk page to discuss the approach. - [[User:Wikmoz|Wikmoz]] ([[User talk:Wikmoz|talk]]) 04:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
::: {{re|Wikmoz}}, yes, soon; I'm still in jet-lag after a trip, will want to be fully alert for this. For the record, I assume you're referring to [[Module talk:Find sources#Multiple RS link sets in a single topic]]. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 16:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
:::: {{re|Mathglot}}, yes. That's the one. - [[User:Wikmoz|Wikmoz]] ([[User talk:Wikmoz|talk]]) 22:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
| |||