Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Images to improve/Archive/Jun 2007: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m MBisanz moved page Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Images to improve/Archive/Jun 2007 to Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Images to improve/Archive/Jun 2007 without leaving a redirect |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{GLarchive| June 2007}}
<span id="63305249328" ></span>
== {{did}} Fujita scale ==
<!--werdnabot-archive-->
Line 31:
::::Looks great! --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 18:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63305249328" ></span>
== {{did}} All-Ireland ==
<!--werdnabot-archive-->
Line 66:
:::Yeah super i know i made it more difficult than i should . Thanks for your help you did a super job ([[User:Gnevin|Gnevin]] 17:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC))
<span id="63305249328" ></span>
== {{did}} Cross-beam diagram ==
<!--werdnabot-archive-->
Line 86:
:: Perfect. [[User:128.158.145.51|128.158.145.51]] 17:25, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63305249328" ></span>
=={{did}}? [[List of Japanese flags]] ==
<!--werdnabot-archive-->
Line 110:
| Quote: "<nowiki>[On fair-use rationales:]</nowiki> Other text indicating conformance with the [[Wikipedia:Logos]] guideline may be added, such as confirmation that the logo has been '''rendered at a small size and with lower detail''' if it is a scalable vector image." from [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline]]
Both vector images are small (notably [[:Image:Hiroshima Symbol.svg]], compared to the original) and not particluarly detailed. I don't know much about fair-use and all that, but I can't see anything that indicates there is anything wrong with vector-images. If anyone else knows anything to the contrary, speak up. --[[User:DTR|Dave the Rave (DTR)]]<small>[[User_talk:DTR|talk]]</small> 20:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63305353471" ></span>
== The Wikipedia French Embassy logo.... ==
Line 153:
The original image has some serious copyright issues, and I have nominated it for deletion on Commons. I do personally think the Wikimedia Foundation ''should'' just release its logos under a free license (though still subject to trademarks, of course), but until they grow some spine and do that, we can't just make them free by insisting that they are so. â[[User:Ilmari Karonen|Ilmari Karonen]] <small>([[User talk:Ilmari Karonen|talk]])</small> 20:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63305531611" ></span>
== :Image:SwansCygnus olor.jpg ==
<!--werdnabot-archive-->
Line 186:
:::::: See [[:commons:Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:SwansCygnus olor edit2.jpgâ]]. In general, people like it, but want it to be have more detail. As I said, tough crowd. If a higher-res version can be generated, it might help. They like their featured pictures to be suitable for printing. Regards, [[User talk:BenAveling|Ben Aveling]] 05:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
::::::: Here is the largest possible from the original. --[[User:Javit|Javit]] 09:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63306446847" ></span>
== Coat of arms of Denmark ==
Line 213:
:::::It would still be great if one of you could make [[:Image:Rigsvåben nationalmuseet.jpg|the photo]] a little clearer / sharper, but I don't know if that is possible. [[User:Valentinian|Valentinian]] <sup>[[User_talk:Valentinian|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/Valentinian|C]]</sup> 12:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63305775267" ></span>
== Tenrec ==
Can anybody help me to improve my photo of [[tenrec]] (Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec - ''Echinops telfairi'')? If thats possible?
Line 225:
'''Graphist opinion:''' Hiya. I think the photo is fairly blurred and not very well composed for content. Yet there is room for improvement post-processing, but probably not worth it unless you demonstrate that the photograph would be a useful addition to a linked article. Thanks! --[[User:Javit|Javit]] 17:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63307441872" ></span>
== {{did}} Progression of [[Dental caries]] ==
<!--werdnabot-archive-->
Line 265:
Smooth surface caries (the second series shown) is described as looking like two triangles, with an apex of one triangle touching the base of the other. It begins as a large area in enamel and shrinks to a point as it nears the ___location where enamel and dentin meet. Once the decay reaches dentin, it again spreads laterally rapidly and sharpens into a point again as it moves toward the pulp.
I realize this may be a lot to do, but I would very much appreciate it! And the [[dental caries|article]] would appreciate it too!!!! - [[User:Dozenist|Dozenist]] [[User talk:Dozenist|<
'''Graphist opinion:'''
Line 271:
=====[[:Image:DentistryLogo.png]]=====
I've created an SVG of the image, with a more realistic colour scheme. The dentine and pulp out towards are faded out towards the bottom which IMO looks better than simply cropping it to the top. Would using the same image (without the fading out) be acceptable for the animations? [[User:Time3000|Time3000]] 14:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
:The colors look ''a ton'' better! The caries will be much easier to identify in the animation that way. For that purpose, you may want to consider lightening the dentin color just slightly, but if you feel that the color is not too dark then do not bother with it. - [[User:Dozenist|Dozenist]] [[User talk:Dozenist|<
::Just to let you know that I am working on the animations... [[User:Time3000|Time3000]] 11:10, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
:::Yay! That's awesome. - [[User:Dozenist|Dozenist]] [[User talk:Dozenist|<
=====Pit and fissure caries animation=====
OK, I've done an animation of pit and fissure caries. It's fairly basic, but it's fairly accurate (as far as I can tell). [[User:Time3000|Time3000]] 12:25, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
:The animation is awesome! It would fit in the article perfectly. I am sure the other animation will be just as good. - [[User:Dozenist|Dozenist]] [[User talk:Dozenist|<
=====Smooth surface caries animation=====
Okay, I ran across this request and thought it wouldn't be too hard. I've uploaded my animation of smooth surface caries to the gallery above. Let me know what you think. -- [[User:VegitaU|VegitaU]] 18:59, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
:The graphic looks amazing. I love how smooth the transition is! I have placed both animations in [[dental caries|the article]], and I think they look really good. At the end of the animation, since this new one moves so much faster, is there any way to make it pause for a second or two so the end result is clearly shown to the reader? Also, when the images are so close together in the article, the difference between the two may be a little distracting. I hate to ask since I have asked so much already, but is there anyway to modify the first animation (the pit-and-fissure caries one) to look like this one? I really love the animations and believe they add a lot to the article (which is almost ready to be sent to FAC). Thank you very much for all your hard work! - [[User:Dozenist|Dozenist]] [[User talk:Dozenist|<
::Okay, I updated the old animation to include a 2-second delay on the last frame and made a smoother the pit caries animation. Hope this helps you out. -- [[User:VegitaU|VegitaU]] 23:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
:::Thanks! The animations are awesome, and they look great in the article. I love it, and thanks again for the work you put in. - [[User:Dozenist|Dozenist]] [[User talk:Dozenist|<
<span id="63307441872" ></span>
== {{did}} Baseball image - high priority==
<!--werdnabot-archive-->
Line 310:
:::::My money's on WP using different scaling algorithms, either because of the different file formats, or because the PNG has an alpha channel. [[User:CountingPine|CountingPine]] 22:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63307610861" ></span>
== The original Mercury seven ==
<center><gallery></gallery></center>
Line 321:
* I don't know if there's very much detail available in the shadows... brightening the darkest parts of the image do make more detail available near the eyes of the person to the furthest left, and a small bit of extra detail in the eyes of the person to the furthest right. Other than that, I think brightening won't do much other than increase the noise. --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 23:27, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63307613819" ></span>
== Photoclinometry ==
<!--werdnabot-archive-->
Line 337:
:Maybe you would be better off asking at [[Wikipedia:Requested pictures]]. --[[User:DTR|Dave the Rave (DTR)]]<small>[[User_talk:DTR|talk]]</small> 21:58, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63307613819" ></span>
== {{did}} Coat of Arms of Bermuda ==
<!--werdnabot-archive-->
Line 363:
How did you make that? SVG is preferable to JPG. Could you export it as such? If not I will use your edition as base for an SVG. Cheers--[[User:Cronholm144|Cronholm]]<sup>[[User talk:Cronholm144|144]]</sup> 00:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
:I took the black and white outline off the PDF file the requestor provided, enlarged it, and used a [[Wacom (company)|Wacom]] tablet to paint it bit by bit based on a ''really'' crappy low-res color image of ''part'' of the Coat of Arms. You'd think the Government of Bermuda website would proudly display their flag, but no... it looks like I have to fly to Bermuda for a decent shot of seeing the real thing.
:Anyways, I'm not proficient enough, it seemes, with Inkscape to make an SVG of this. I just haven't worked with that type of file type. If you upload an SVG version of this, please upload it to Image:Bermuda-Coat-of-Arms-SVG.svg on the Commons. My attempt didn't work and there's no reason not to overwrite it. Thanks. -- [[User:VegitaU|VegitaU]] 01:10, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Line 387:
Perhaps someone should send an E-mail to Bermuda telling them that we finished their COA for them :-)--[[User:Cronholm144|Cronholm]]<sup>[[User talk:Cronholm144|144]]</sup> 02:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63307613819" ></span>
=={{did}} Scouting in Laos==
<!--werdnabot-archive-->
Line 439:
*Beautiful, perfect, spot-on! Thank you! [[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris]] 21:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63307613819" ></span>
=={{did}} Ethiopia Scout Association==
<!--werdnabot-archive-->
Line 474:
{|class="userboxes" style=" border: #99B3FF solid 1px; background-color: #FFFFFF; color: #000000; float: left; -moz-border-radius: 10px;"
|<div style="font-size: 120%;"></div>
<div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="padding:0;border-style:none;width:800px; -moz-border-radius: 10px;">
<div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="border-style:none;padding:0;width:800px; -moz-border-radius: 10px;">
<div class="NavHead" style="background:#AAF1D9;text-align:left;text-style:normal;width:800px; -moz-border-radius: 10px;">
<center>How to Download SVG's Discussion</center></div><div class="NavContent" style="
:Cool, as regards to downloading SVG, there are two ways,
| |||