Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive index: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Writing index of archives in Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive <#> due to request from Talk:Evolution as fact and theory - Bot edit
Legobot (talk | contribs)
Bot: Updating index
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1:
<!-- HBC Archive Indexerbot can blank this -->
This report has been generated because of a request at [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory]]. It covers the archives that match '''Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive <#>'''
<br/>Report generated at 12:27, 15 November 2011 (UTC) by <small><sup>[[User:HBC Archive Indexerbot|HBCAI]]</sup></small>
----
 
Report generated based on a request from [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory]]. It matches the following masks: Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive <#>, Talk:Evolution as fact and theory.<br>
{{last edited by}}
{| class="sortable"
! Discussion Topic !! Replies (estimated) !! Archive Link
 
|-
| &#39;Theory&#39;Purported shouldreason notfor be in contradistinction to &#39;fact&#39;deletion || 101 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#'Theory'_should_not_be_in_contradistinction_to_'fact'|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 31#Purported reason for deletion]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| &quot;Fact&quot;Evolution not a scientific fact? || 2 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#.22Fact.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Evolution not a scientific fact?]]
 
|-
| Evolution not a piece of data from an experiment || 8 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Evolution not a piece of data from an experiment]]
| &quot;Which meaning of evolution is intended, if it is not explicit, can be discerned by the context.&quot; || 38 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#.22Which_meaning_of_evolution_is_intended.2C_if_it_is_not_explicit.2C_can_be_discerned_by_the_context..22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| AMerge generalwith reminder.Misunderstandings about evolution || 1 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#A_general_reminder.|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 41#Merge with Misunderstandings about evolution]]
 
|-
| AMicroevolution jokeversus macroevolution || 313 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#A_joke|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 31#Microevolution versus macroevolution]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| AlternativePlumbing suggestionis a science and Cleaning Toilets is a religion || 3 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Alternative_suggestion|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 31#Plumbing is a science and Cleaning Toilets is a religion]]
 
|-
| AnotherIt suggestionseems to me that Evolution is a fact not a theory at all. || 228 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Another_suggestion|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 31#It seems to me that Evolution is a fact not a theory at all.]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Article by GregoryResponse || 26 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_5}}#Article_by_Gregory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 51#Response]]
 
|-
| Article byuses Gregoryincorrect definition of &#34;scientific fact&#34; || 24 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Article_by_Gregory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Article uses incorrect definition of &#34;scientific fact&#34;]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ArticleHair missing a section?splitting || 23 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Article_missing_a_section.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Hair splitting]]
 
|-
| ArticleFact on FactsQuiz || 535 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Article_on_Facts|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 21#Fact Quiz]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Article uses incorrect definition of &quot;scientific fact&quot;Edwards || 42 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Article_uses_incorrect_definition_of_.22scientific_fact.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Edwards]]
 
|-
| AsFundamental a rebuttal to &lt;s&gt;evolutionists&lt;/s&gt; creationistsflaw || 85 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#As_a_rebuttal_to_evolutionists_creationists|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 31#Fundamental flaw]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| BeforeRefuted you get too excitedtheory || 352 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Before_you_get_too_excited|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 21#Refuted theory]]
 
|-
| Biased towards Evolution&#34;Fact&#34; || 192 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Biased_towards_Evolution|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 21#&#34;Fact&#34;]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| BigSecond Problemsentence || 72 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Big_Problem|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 31#Second sentence]]
 
|-
| BoltzmannArticle Hmissing Theorema section? || 2 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Boltzmann_H_Theorem|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 21#Article missing a section?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| BreakOther - mathematical theory&#34;theories&#34; || 112 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Break_-_mathematical_theory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Other &#34;theories&#34;]]
 
|-
| Breakdefinition inof the proposalevolution || 82 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Break_in_the_proposal|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#definition of evolution]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| BrilliantMisunderstanding of fact, theory, and everything in between || 213 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Brilliant|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 21#Misunderstanding of fact, theory, and everything in between]]
 
|-
| CausationMy changes to The Terminology of Science || 53 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_5}}#Causation|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 51#My changes to The Terminology of Science]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| CausationCreationist rant || 54 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Causation|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Creationist rant]]
 
|-
| changesSemi-protecting inthe populations of biological organisms over timearticle? || 31 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#changes_in_populations_of_biological_organisms_over_time|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 41#Semi-protecting the article?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Inappropriate Tone in section &#34;Evolution as theory and fact in the literature&#34; || 2 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Inappropriate Tone in section &#34;Evolution as theory and fact in the literature&#34;]]
| Changes to lead || 2 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Changes_to_lead|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory]]
 
|-
| Citedirectly forfrom &quot;changesfirst in populations of organisms over time&quot;?source || 14 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Cite_for_.22changes_in_populations_of_organisms_over_time.22.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 41#directly from first source]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ConcernOriginal regarding first paragraphstudy? || 171 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Concern_regarding_first_paragraph|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 42#Original study?]]
 
|-
| ControvercyBiased towards Evolution || 520 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Controvercy|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 42#Biased towards Evolution]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| CreationistToo rantdifficult to edit (better way?) || 41 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Creationist_rant|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#Too difficult to edit (better way?)]]
 
|-
| DawkinsReference tackles this more expicitly in his new bookerror || 83 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Dawkins_tackles_this_more_expicitly_in_his_new_book|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 42#Reference error]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| DefineFacts whatare isa meantjudgement by &quot;evolution&quot;call || 314 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Define_what_is_meant_by_.22evolution.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Facts are a judgement call]]
 
|-
| definitionPersistent ofcomments evolutionthat this article is confused || 218 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#definition_of_evolution|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 15#Persistent comments that this article is confused]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| directlyArticle fromon first sourceFacts || 45 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#directly_from_first_source|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#Article on Facts]]
 
|-
| Popper&#39;s falsifiability || 2 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Popper&#39;s falsifiability]]
| Does this article properly reflect the opinions of the quoted sources? || 41 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_5}}#Does_this_article_properly_reflect_the_opinions_of_the_quoted_sources.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 5]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Is a fact || 8 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Is a fact]]
| Does this article properly reflect the opinions of the quoted sources? || 41 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Does_this_article_properly_reflect_the_opinions_of_the_quoted_sources.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory]]
 
|-
| EdwardsInaccuracies || 230 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Edwards|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#Inaccuracies]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| EncouragingOne useand ofthe asame logicalclaim fallacy?can be both fact and theory || 71 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_5}}#Encouraging_use_of_a_logical_fallacy.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 52#One and the same claim can be both fact and theory]]
 
|-
| EncouragingHow usethe ofword aevolution logicalis fallacy?used || 710 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Encouraging_use_of_a_logical_fallacy.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#How the word evolution is used]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Evolution is notJust a theory. Evolutionary theory is a theory.thought || 73 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Evolution_is_not_a_theory._Evolutionary_theory_is_a_theory.|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 32#Just a thought]]
 
|-
| EvolutionDefine what is meant by &#3934;evolution&#39;&#39;not&#39;&#39;&#3934; a piece of data from an experiment || 83 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Evolution_not_a_piece_of_data_from_an_experiment|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#Define what is meant by &#34;evolution&#34;]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Evolution not a scientific fact?Brilliant || 2 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Evolution_not_a_scientific_fact.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#Brilliant]]
 
|-
| Evolutionary theory predicts novelTo: inventions65.87.184.50 || 723 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Evolutionary_theory_predicts_novel_inventions|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#To: 65.87.184.50]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| EvolutionaryBefore theoryyou predictsget noveltoo inventionsexcited || 735 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Evolutionary_theory_predicts_novel_inventions_2|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Before you get too excited]]
 
|-
| ExplanationSection ofon restored&#34;Evolution sentenceas theory and fact in the literature&#34; || 14 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Explanation_of_restored_sentence|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 32#Section on &#34;Evolution as theory and fact in the literature&#34;]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| FactBoltzmann andH TheoryTheorem || 202 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Fact_and_Theory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 42#Boltzmann H Theorem]]
 
|-
| Factlaws Quizand proof || 355 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Fact_Quiz|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#laws and proof]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| FactBig vs. TheoryProblem || 127 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Fact_vs._Theory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 63#Big Problem]]
 
|-
| FactGravity vs.as Theoryfact || 122 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Fact_vs._Theory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Gravity as fact]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| FactsNational areAcademy aof judgement callSciences || 145 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Facts_are_a_judgement_call|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#National Academy of Sciences]]
 
|-
| falsifiedGravity hypothesesand Evolution ???? || 821 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#falsified_hypotheses|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 43#Gravity and Evolution ????]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| FirstThis paragrapharticle is a rant || 334 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#First_paragraph|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#This article is a rant]]
 
|-
| ForThe whyobserved doesn&#39;t it saychanges &quot;ofin how&quot;?populations || 43 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#For_why_doesn't_it_say_.22of_how.22.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 43#The observed changes in populations]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| FundamentalAs flawa rebuttal to evolutionists creationists || 58 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Fundamental_flaw|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 13#As a rebuttal to evolutionists creationists]]
 
|-
| GravityNo and Evolutionoriginal ????Research || 2112 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Gravity_and_Evolution_.3F.3F.3F.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#No original Research]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| GravitySome andhits fruitfrom flies&#34;the other side&#34; || 32 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_5}}#Gravity_and_fruit_flies|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 53#Some hits from &#34;the other side&#34;]]
 
|-
| GravityNPOV andtag fruitWAS fliesrecommended by AFD closure || 311 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Gravity_and_fruit_flies|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#NPOV tag WAS recommended by AFD closure]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| GravityView asof factthose opposed to evolution || 213 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Gravity_as_fact|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#View of those opposed to evolution]]
 
|-
| GreatPlease articlereturn ...the keepNPOV ittag || 211 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Great_article_..._keep_it|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Please return the NPOV tag]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Hair&#39;Theory&#39; splittingshould not be in contradistinction to &#39;fact&#39; || 310 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Hair_splitting|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 13#&#39;Theory&#39; should not be in contradistinction to &#39;fact&#39;]]
 
|-
| HowWho theconsiders wordwhat evolution is usedfact? || 105 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#How_the_word_evolution_is_used|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#Who considers what fact?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| InaccuraciesThe Theory of Evolution is NOT True || 308 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Inaccuracies|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#The Theory of Evolution is NOT True]]
 
|-
| Quick question || 4 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Quick question]]
| Inappropriate Tone in section &quot;Evolution as theory and fact in the literature&quot; || 2 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Inappropriate_Tone_in_section_.22Evolution_as_theory_and_fact_in_the_literature.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Inclusion of pollsUnencyclopedic || 176 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Inclusion_of_polls|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Unencyclopedic]]
 
|-
| IntroductionPage ofserves fallacious materialno into the articlepurpose || 810 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Introduction_of_fallacious_material_into_the_article|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Page serves no purpose]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| IsAlternative a factsuggestion || 83 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Is_a_fact|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#Alternative suggestion]]
 
|-
| ItAnother seems to me that Evolution is a fact not a theory at all.suggestion || 822 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#It_seems_to_me_that_Evolution_is_a_fact_not_a_theory_at_all.|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 13#Another suggestion]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| JustWhat ais thoughtevolution? || 36 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Just_a_thought|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#What is evolution?]]
 
|-
| lawsThe andEarth Rotates Round the Sun: proofFact? || 512 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#laws_and_proof|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#The Earth Rotates Round the Sun: Fact?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Logic || 29 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Logic|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Logic]]
 
|-
| LooksSeveral like some inconsistencies in the articlesuggestions || 123 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Looks_like_some_inconsistencies_in_the_article|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 43#Several suggestions]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| MeaningsGreat ofarticle the... wordkeep &#39;evolution&#39;.it || 132 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_5}}#Meanings_of_the_word_'evolution'.|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 53#Great article ... keep it]]
 
|-
| Meanings ofThinning the wordcitations &#39;evolution&#39;.in the lead || 133 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Meanings_of_the_word_'evolution'.|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Thinning the citations in the lead]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Evolution is not a theory. Evolutionary theory is a theory. || 7 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Evolution is not a theory. Evolutionary theory is a theory.]]
| Merge with [[Misunderstandings about evolution]] || 1 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Merge_with_Misunderstandings_about_evolution|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1]]
 
|-
| MicroevolutionExplanation versusof macroevolutionrestored sentence || 121 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Microevolution_versus_macroevolution|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 13#Explanation of restored sentence]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| MisunderstandingMuller ofand fact,Gould theory,quotes andare everything in betweencontradictory || 135 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Misunderstanding_of_fact.2C_theory.2C_and_everything_in_between|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 13#Muller and Gould quotes are contradictory]]
 
|-
| MoreThe ReferencesReal Problem || Unknown3 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#More_References|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 13#The Real Problem]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| MullerInclusion and Gould quotes areof contradictorypolls || 517 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Muller_and_Gould_quotes_are_contradictory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Inclusion of polls]]
 
|-
| MyA changes to &#39;&#39;The Terminology of Science&#39;&#39;joke || 3 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#My_changes_to_The_Terminology_of_Science|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 13#A joke]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| NationalObjections Academyto the fact of Sciencesevolution - Irrelevant for this article || 54 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#National_Academy_of_Sciences|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Objections to the fact of evolution - Irrelevant for this article]]
 
|-
| Supporting evidence for the fact of evolution -- also irrelevant to this article || 7 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Supporting evidence for the fact of evolution -- also irrelevant to this article]]
| No original Research || 12 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#No_original_Research|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| NPOVIntroduction tagof WASfallacious recommendedmaterial byinto AFDthe closurearticle || 118 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#NPOV_tag_WAS_recommended_by_AFD_closure|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Introduction of fallacious material into the article]]
 
|-
| Or is there a rule on this page that no change can be made without first posting it on the talk page? || 5 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#Or is there a rule on this page that no change can be made without first posting it on the talk page?]]
| Objections to the fact of evolution - Irrelevant for this article || 4 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Objections_to_the_fact_of_evolution_-_Irrelevant_for_this_article|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| &#34;Which meaning of evolution is intended, if it is not explicit, can be discerned by the context.&#34; || 39 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#&#34;Which meaning of evolution is intended, if it is not explicit, can be discerned by the context.&#34;]]
| One and the same claim can be &#39;&#39;both&#39;&#39; fact and theory || 1 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#One_and_the_same_claim_can_be_both_fact_and_theory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2]]
 
|-
| Concern regarding first paragraph || 17 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#Concern regarding first paragraph]]
| Or is there a rule on this page that no change can be made without first posting it on the talk page? || 5 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Or_is__there_a_rule_on_this_page_that_no_change_can_be_made_without_first_posting_it_on_the_talk_page.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| OriginalA study?general reminder. || 1 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Original_study.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 24#A general reminder.]]
 
|-
| OtherRemoving &quot#34;theoriesthe observed&quot#34; || 25 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Other_.22theories.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 14#Removing &#34;the observed&#34;]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| OutlineCite for &#34;changes in populations of organisms over time&#34;? || Unknown1 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Outline|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 14#Cite for &#34;changes in populations of organisms over time&#34;?]]
 
|-
| PageFor serveswhy doesn&#39;t noit purposesay &#34;of how&#34;? || 104 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Page_serves__no_purpose|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 34#For why doesn&#39;t it say &#34;of how&#34;?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Persistentfalsified comments that this article is confusedhypotheses || 118 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_5}}#Persistent_comments_that_this_article_is_confused|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 54#falsified hypotheses]]
 
|-
| PersistentTrue commentsin thataddition thisto article is confusedfactual || 115 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Persistent_comments_that_this_article_is_confused|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#True in addition to factual]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| PleaseLooks returnlike thesome NPOVinconsistencies tagin the article || 1112 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Please_return_the_NPOV_tag|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 34#Looks like some inconsistencies in the article]]
 
|-
| PlumbingPurpose isof athis science and Cleaning Toilets is a religionArticle || 310 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Plumbing_is_a_science_and_Cleaning_Toilets_is_a_religion|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 14#Purpose of this Article]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Popper&#39;sFact and falsifiabilityTheory || 220 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Popper's_falsifiability|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 24#Fact and Theory]]
 
|-
| PredictiveSource powerof ambiguity || 15 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Predictive_power|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#Source of ambiguity]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ProofControvercy || 135 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Proof|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#Controvercy]]
 
|-
| PurportedRemoval reasonof for deletionText || 13 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Purported_reason_for_deletion|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 14#Removal of Text]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| PurposeThe offact section doesn&#39;t seem to be parallel with the its thismain Articlearticle || 1034 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Purpose_of_this_Article|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#The fact section doesn&#39;t seem to be parallel with the its main article]]
 
|-
| QuickWhat questionis this article about? || 46 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Quick_question|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 34#What is this article about?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Referencechanges errorin populations of biological organisms over time || 3 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Reference_error|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 24#changes in populations of biological organisms over time]]
 
|-
| RefutedDawkins theorytackles this more expicitly in his new book || 28 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Refuted_theory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 14#Dawkins tackles this more expicitly in his new book]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| RemovalSection ofon Text&#34;Evolution compared with gravity&#34; OR? || 3 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Removal_of_Text|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#Section on &#34;Evolution compared with gravity&#34; OR?]]
 
|-
| RemovingEncouraging &quot;theuse observed&quot;of a logical fallacy? || 57 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Removing_.22the_observed.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 45#Encouraging use of a logical fallacy?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ResponseCausation || 65 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Response|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 15#Causation]]
 
|-
| RevisedGravity proposaland infruit fullflies || 123 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Revised_proposal_in_full|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 5#Gravity and fruit flies]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Scientific theoriesTone || 143 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Scientific_theories|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 65#Tone]]
 
|-
| ScientificArticle theoriesby Gregory || 12 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Scientific_theories|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 5#Article by Gregory]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| SecondMeanings paragraphof the word &#39;evolution&#39;. || 313 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Second_paragraph|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 5#Meanings of the word &#39;evolution&#39;.]]
 
|-
| SecondDoes sentencethis article properly reflect the opinions of the quoted sources? || 241 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Second_sentence|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 15#Does this article properly reflect the opinions of the quoted sources?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| SectionFact on &quot;Evolution as theory and fact in thevs. literature&quot;Theory || 412 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Section_on_.22Evolution_as_theory_and_fact_in_the_literature.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 26#Fact vs. Theory]]
 
|-
| SectionScientific on &quot;Evolution compared with gravity&quot; OR?theories || 31 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Section_on_.22Evolution_compared_with_gravity.22_OR.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 46#Scientific theories]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Semi-protectingEvolutionary thetheory predicts novel article?inventions || 17 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Semi-protecting_the_article.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 16#Evolutionary theory predicts novel inventions]]
 
|-
| Evolutionary theory predicts novel inventions || 7 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Evolutionary theory predicts novel inventions 2]]
| Serious problems with this fact and theory article || 6 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Serious_problems_with_this_fact_and_theory_article|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| SeveralPredictive suggestionspower || 315 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Several_suggestions|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Predictive power]]
 
|-
| Some hits from &quot;the other side&quot;Proof || 213 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Some_hits_from_.22the_other_side.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Proof]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| SourceSerious ofproblems ambiguitywith this fact and theory article || 156 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Source_of_ambiguity|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 46#Serious problems with this fact and theory article]]
 
|-
| Supporting evidence for the fact of evolution -- also irrelevantChanges to this articlelead || 72 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Supporting_evidence_for_the_fact_of_evolution_--_also_irrelevant_to_this_article|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Changes to lead]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| TheBreak Earth Rotates Roundin the Sun: Fact?proposal || 128 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#The_Earth_Rotates_Round_the_Sun:_Fact.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Break in the proposal]]
 
|-
| TheFirst fact section doesn&#39;t seem to be parallel with the its main articleparagraph || 343 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#The_fact_section_doesn't_seem_to_be_parallel_with_the_its_main_article|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 46#First paragraph]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| TheSecond observed changes in populationsparagraph || 3 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#The_observed_changes_in_populations|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Second paragraph]]
 
|-
| TheRevised Realproposal Problemin full || 312 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#The_Real_Problem|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Revised proposal in full]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| TheBreak Theory- ofmathematical Evolution is NOT Truetheory || 811 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#The_Theory_of_Evolution_is_NOT_True|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Break - mathematical theory]]
 
|-
| ThinningProof thein citations&#34;Related inconcepts theand leadterminology&#34; || 3 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Thinning_the_citations_in_the_lead|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Proof in &#34;Related concepts and terminology&#34;]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ThisUndid articlerevision isto aH-W ranttheory || 341 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#This_article_is_a_rant|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Undid revision to H-W theory]]
 
|-
| To:Hardy-Weinberg content is 65.87.184.50incorrect || 2313 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#To:_65.87.184.50|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 26#Hardy-Weinberg content is incorrect]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ToneRemoving paragraph comparing evolution to gravity || 4347 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_5}}#Tone|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 56#Removing paragraph comparing evolution to gravity]]
 
|-
| ToneReining this debate in || 438 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Tone|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Reining this debate in]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| TooBelief difficultin to edit (better way?)theory || 180 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Too_difficult_to_edit_.28better_way.3F.29|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 26#Belief in theory]]
 
|-
| TrueA infew addition to factualcomments || 57 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#True_in_addition_to_factual|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 47#A few comments]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| UnencyclopedicGerm theory of diseases in the lead || 61 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Unencyclopedic|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 37#Germ theory of diseases in the lead]]
 
|-
| ViewComparing of those opposedevolution to evolutiongravity || 1310 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#View_of_those_opposed_to_evolution|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 37#Comparing evolution to gravity]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| What isComparing evolution? to gravity || 611 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#What_is_evolution.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 37#Comparing evolution to gravity 2]]
 
|-
| Redefines Wikipedia&#39;s own definition of &#34;Theory&#34; and &#34;Fact&#34; || 7 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Redefines Wikipedia&#39;s own definition of &#34;Theory&#34; and &#34;Fact&#34;]]
| What is this article about? || 6 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#What_is_this_article_about.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Who considers what fact?inductive/deductive || 52 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Who_considers_what_fact.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 37#inductive/deductive]]
 
|-
| &#34;Evolution is both fact and theory&#34; - Nope not all scientists agree || 23 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#&#34;Evolution is both fact and theory&#34; - Nope not all scientists agree]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Clarification on fact || 1 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Clarification on fact]]
 
|-
| Phantom Citations || 8 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Phantom Citations]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Suggestions to Improve This Article || 20 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Suggestions to Improve This Article]]
 
|-
| Evolution as theory and fact in the literature || 4 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Evolution as theory and fact in the literature]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Phenomena of evolution || 7 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Phenomena of evolution]]
 
|-
| FAQ question 4 || 36 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#FAQ question 4]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Recent change to lead || 2 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 8#Recent change to lead]]
 
|-
| Revisions to first section on fact || 1 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Revisions to first section on fact]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Review of fact || 1 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Review of fact]]
 
|-
| Obscurity || 4 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 8#Obscurity]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Removal of FAQ || 5 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 8#Removal of FAQ]]
 
|-
| Formal inference? || 14 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 8#Formal inference?]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Material moved || 1 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory#Material moved]]
 
|-
| Return previous lead || 8 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 8#Return previous lead]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Defining evolution || 7 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory#Defining evolution]]
 
|-
| E as T&#38;F &#34;in the literature&#34; || 2 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory#E as T&#38;F &#34;in the literature&#34;]]
 
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Fitzhugh reworked || 1 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory#Fitzhugh reworked]]
 
|-
| Proposal to undo the removal of Prof Smiddy&#39;s quote || 7 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory#Proposal to undo the removal of Prof Smiddy&#39;s quote]]
 
|}