<!-- HBC Archive Indexerbot can blank this -->
This report has been generated because of a request at [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory]]. It covers the archives that match '''Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive <#>'''
<br/>Report generated at 07:06, 27 June 2012 (UTC) by <small><sup>[[User:HBC Archive Indexerbot|HBCAI]]</sup></small>
----
Report generated based on a request from [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory]]. It matches the following masks: Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive <#>, Talk:Evolution as fact and theory.<br>
{{last edited by}}
{| class="sortable"
! Discussion Topic !! Replies (estimated) !! Archive Link
|-
| 'Theory'Purported shouldreason notfor be in contradistinction to 'fact'deletion || 101 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#'Theory'_should_not_be_in_contradistinction_to_'fact'|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 31#Purported reason for deletion]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| "Evolution is both fact and theory" - <del>Nope</del> not alla scientistsscientific agreefact? || 232 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#.22Evolution_is_both_fact_and_theory.22_-_Nope_not_all_scientists_agree|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Evolution not a scientific fact?]]
|-
| "Fact"Evolution not a piece of data from an experiment || 28 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#.22Fact.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Evolution not a piece of data from an experiment]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Merge with Misunderstandings about evolution || 1 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Merge with Misunderstandings about evolution]]
| "Which meaning of evolution is intended, if it is not explicit, can be discerned by the context." || 38 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#.22Which_meaning_of_evolution_is_intended.2C_if_it_is_not_explicit.2C_can_be_discerned_by_the_context..22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4]]
|-
| AMicroevolution fewversus commentsmacroevolution || 713 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_7}}#A_few_comments|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 71#Microevolution versus macroevolution]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| APlumbing generalis reminder.a science and Cleaning Toilets is a religion || 13 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#A_general_reminder.|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 41#Plumbing is a science and Cleaning Toilets is a religion]]
|-
| AIt jokeseems to me that Evolution is a fact not a theory at all. || 38 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#A_joke|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 31#It seems to me that Evolution is a fact not a theory at all.]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Alternative suggestionResponse || 36 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Alternative_suggestion|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 31#Response]]
|-
| AnotherArticle suggestionuses incorrect definition of "scientific fact" || 224 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Another_suggestion|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 31#Article uses incorrect definition of "scientific fact"]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ArticleHair by Gregorysplitting || 23 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_5}}#Article_by_Gregory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 51#Hair splitting]]
|-
| ArticleFact missing a section?Quiz || 235 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Article_missing_a_section.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Fact Quiz]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Article on FactsEdwards || 52 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Article_on_Facts|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 21#Edwards]]
|-
| ArticleFundamental uses incorrect definition of "scientific fact"flaw || 45 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Article_uses_incorrect_definition_of_.22scientific_fact.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Fundamental flaw]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| AsRefuted a rebuttal to <s>evolutionists</s> creationiststheory || 82 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#As_a_rebuttal_to_evolutionists_creationists|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 31#Refuted theory]]
|-
| Before you get too excited"Fact" || 352 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Before_you_get_too_excited|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 21#"Fact"]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| BeliefSecond in theorysentence || 792 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Belief_in_theory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 61#Second sentence]]
|-
| BiasedArticle towardsmissing Evolutiona section? || 192 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Biased_towards_Evolution|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 21#Article missing a section?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| BigOther Problem"theories" || 72 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Big_Problem|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 31#Other "theories"]]
|-
| Boltzmanndefinition Hof Theoremevolution || 2 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Boltzmann_H_Theorem|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 21#definition of evolution]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| BreakMisunderstanding -of mathematicalfact, theory, and everything in between || 1113 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Break_-_mathematical_theory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 61#Misunderstanding of fact, theory, and everything in between]]
|-
| BreakMy inchanges theto proposalThe Terminology of Science || 83 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Break_in_the_proposal|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 61#My changes to The Terminology of Science]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| BrilliantCreationist rant || 24 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Brilliant|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 21#Creationist rant]]
|-
| CausationSemi-protecting the article? || 51 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_5}}#Causation|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 51#Semi-protecting the article?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Inappropriate Tone in section "Evolution as theory and fact in the literature" || 2 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Inappropriate Tone in section "Evolution as theory and fact in the literature"]]
| changes in populations of biological organisms over time || 3 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#changes_in_populations_of_biological_organisms_over_time|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4]]
|-
| Changesdirectly tofrom leadfirst source || 24 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Changes_to_lead|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 61#directly from first source]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| CiteOriginal for "changes in populations of organisms over time"study? || 1 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Cite_for_.22changes_in_populations_of_organisms_over_time.22.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 42#Original study?]]
|-
| ClarificationBiased ontowards factEvolution || 120 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Clarification_on_fact|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Biased towards Evolution]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ComparingToo evolutiondifficult to gravityedit (better way?) || 101 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Comparing_evolution_to_gravity|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Too difficult to edit (better way?)]]
|-
| ConcernReference regarding first paragrapherror || 173 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Concern_regarding_first_paragraph|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 42#Reference error]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ControvercyFacts are a judgement call || 514 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Controvercy|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 42#Facts are a judgement call]]
|-
| CreationistPersistent rantcomments that this article is confused || 418 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Creationist_rant|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 15#Persistent comments that this article is confused]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| DawkinsArticle tackleson this more expicitly in his new bookFacts || 85 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Dawkins_tackles_this_more_expicitly_in_his_new_book|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 42#Article on Facts]]
|-
| Define what is meant by Popper"evolution"#39;s falsifiability || 32 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Define_what_is_meant_by_.22evolution.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Popper's falsifiability]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| definitionIs ofa evolutionfact || 28 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#definition_of_evolution|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#Is a fact]]
|-
| directly from first sourceInaccuracies || 430 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#directly_from_first_source|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#Inaccuracies]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| DoesOne thisand articlethe properlysame reflectclaim thecan opinionsbe ofboth thefact quotedand sources?theory || 411 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_5}}#Does_this_article_properly_reflect_the_opinions_of_the_quoted_sources.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 52#One and the same claim can be both fact and theory]]
|-
| EdwardsHow the word evolution is used || 210 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Edwards|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#How the word evolution is used]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Encouraging use ofJust a logical fallacy?thought || 73 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_5}}#Encouraging_use_of_a_logical_fallacy.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 52#Just a thought]]
|-
| EvolutionDefine what is notmeant aby theory. Evolutionary theory is a theory."evolution" || 73 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Evolution_is_not_a_theory._Evolutionary_theory_is_a_theory.|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 32#Define what is meant by "evolution"]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Evolution '''not''' a piece of data from an experimentBrilliant || 82 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Evolution_not_a_piece_of_data_from_an_experiment|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#Brilliant]]
|-
| EvolutionTo: not a scientific fact?65.87.184.50 || 223 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Evolution_not_a_scientific_fact.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#To: 65.87.184.50]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| EvolutionaryBefore theoryyou predictsget noveltoo inventionsexcited || 735 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Evolutionary_theory_predicts_novel_inventions|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 62#Before you get too excited]]
|-
| EvolutionarySection on "Evolution as theory predictsand novelfact inventionsin the literature" || 74 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Evolutionary_theory_predicts_novel_inventions_2|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 62#Section on "Evolution as theory and fact in the literature"]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ExplanationBoltzmann ofH restored sentenceTheorem || 12 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Explanation_of_restored_sentence|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 32#Boltzmann H Theorem]]
|-
| Factlaws and Theoryproof || 205 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Fact_and_Theory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 42#laws and proof]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| FactBig QuizProblem || 357 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Fact_Quiz|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 13#Big Problem]]
|-
| FactGravity vs.as Theoryfact || 122 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Fact_vs._Theory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 62#Gravity as fact]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| FactsNational areAcademy aof judgement callSciences || 145 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Facts_are_a_judgement_call|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#National Academy of Sciences]]
|-
| falsifiedGravity hypothesesand Evolution ???? || 821 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#falsified_hypotheses|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 43#Gravity and Evolution ????]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| FirstThis paragrapharticle is a rant || 334 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#First_paragraph|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 63#This article is a rant]]
|-
| ForThe whyobserved doesn't it saychanges "ofin how"?populations || 43 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#For_why_doesn't_it_say_.22of_how.22.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 43#The observed changes in populations]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| FundamentalAs flawa rebuttal to evolutionists creationists || 58 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Fundamental_flaw|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 13#As a rebuttal to evolutionists creationists]]
|-
| GermNo theory of diseases in theoriginal leadResearch || 112 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_7}}#Germ_theory_of_diseases_in_the_lead|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 73#No original Research]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| GravitySome andhits Evolutionfrom ????"the other side" || 212 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Gravity_and_Evolution_.3F.3F.3F.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Some hits from "the other side"]]
|-
| GravityNPOV andtag WAS recommended by fruitAFD fliesclosure || 311 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_5}}#Gravity_and_fruit_flies|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 53#NPOV tag WAS recommended by AFD closure]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| GravityView asof factthose opposed to evolution || 213 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Gravity_as_fact|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#View of those opposed to evolution]]
|-
| GreatPlease articlereturn ...the keepNPOV ittag || 211 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Great_article_..._keep_it|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Please return the NPOV tag]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Hair'Theory' splittingshould not be in contradistinction to 'fact' || 310 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Hair_splitting|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 13#'Theory' should not be in contradistinction to 'fact']]
|-
| Hardy-WeinbergWho contentconsiders iswhat incorrectfact? || 135 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Hardy-Weinberg_content_is_incorrect|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 63#Who considers what fact?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| HowThe theTheory wordof evolutionEvolution is usedNOT True || 108 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#How_the_word_evolution_is_used|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#The Theory of Evolution is NOT True]]
|-
| InaccuraciesQuick question || 304 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Inaccuracies|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#Quick question]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Unencyclopedic || 6 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Unencyclopedic]]
| Inappropriate Tone in section "Evolution as theory and fact in the literature" || 2 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Inappropriate_Tone_in_section_.22Evolution_as_theory_and_fact_in_the_literature.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1]]
|-
| InclusionPage ofserves polls no purpose || 1710 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Inclusion_of_polls|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Page serves no purpose]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| inductive/deductiveAlternative suggestion || 23 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#inductive/deductive|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Alternative suggestion]]
|-
| IntroductionAnother of fallacious material into the articlesuggestion || 822 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Introduction_of_fallacious_material_into_the_article|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Another suggestion]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| IsWhat ais factevolution? || 86 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Is_a_fact|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#What is evolution?]]
|-
| ItThe seemsEarth toRotates meRound thatthe Evolution is a fact not a theory atSun: all.Fact? || 812 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#It_seems_to_me_that_Evolution_is_a_fact_not_a_theory_at_all.|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 13#The Earth Rotates Round the Sun: Fact?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Just a thoughtLogic || 329 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Just_a_thought|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Logic]]
|-
| lawsSeveral and proofsuggestions || 53 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#laws_and_proof|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#Several suggestions]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| LogicGreat article ... keep it || 292 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Logic|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#Great article ... keep it]]
|-
| LooksThinning like somethe inconsistenciescitations in the articlelead || 123 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Looks_like_some_inconsistencies_in_the_article|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 43#Thinning the citations in the lead]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| MeaningsEvolution ofis thenot worda 'evolution'theory. Evolutionary theory is a theory. || 137 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_5}}#Meanings_of_the_word_'evolution'.|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 53#Evolution is not a theory. Evolutionary theory is a theory.]]
|-
| MergeExplanation withof [[Misunderstandings aboutrestored evolution]]sentence || 1 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Merge_with_Misunderstandings_about_evolution|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 13#Explanation of restored sentence]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| MicroevolutionMuller versusand Gould quotes are macroevolutioncontradictory || 125 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Microevolution_versus_macroevolution|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 13#Muller and Gould quotes are contradictory]]
|-
| MisunderstandingThe ofReal fact, theory, and everything in betweenProblem || 133 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Misunderstanding_of_fact.2C_theory.2C_and_everything_in_between|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 13#The Real Problem]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| MoreInclusion Referencesof polls || Unknown17 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#More_References|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 13#Inclusion of polls]]
|-
| MullerA and Gould quotes are contradictoryjoke || 53 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Muller_and_Gould_quotes_are_contradictory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#A joke]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| My changesObjections to ''Thethe Terminologyfact of Science''evolution - Irrelevant for this article || 34 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#My_changes_to_The_Terminology_of_Science|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 13#Objections to the fact of evolution - Irrelevant for this article]]
|-
| NationalSupporting Academyevidence for the fact of Sciencesevolution -- also irrelevant to this article || 57 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#National_Academy_of_Sciences|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Supporting evidence for the fact of evolution -- also irrelevant to this article]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| NoIntroduction originalof Researchfallacious material into the article || 128 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#No_original_Research|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Introduction of fallacious material into the article]]
|-
| Or is there a rule on this page that no change can be made without first posting it on the talk page? || 5 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#Or is there a rule on this page that no change can be made without first posting it on the talk page?]]
| NPOV tag WAS recommended by AFD closure || 11 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#NPOV_tag_WAS_recommended_by_AFD_closure|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| "Which meaning of evolution is intended, if it is not explicit, can be discerned by the context." || 39 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#"Which meaning of evolution is intended, if it is not explicit, can be discerned by the context."]]
| Objections to the fact of evolution - Irrelevant for this article || 4 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Objections_to_the_fact_of_evolution_-_Irrelevant_for_this_article|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3]]
|-
| OneConcern andregarding thefirst same claim can be ''both'' fact and theoryparagraph || 117 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#One_and_the_same_claim_can_be_both_fact_and_theory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 24#Concern regarding first paragraph]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| A general reminder. || 1 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#A general reminder.]]
| Or is there a rule on this page that no change can be made without first posting it on the talk page? || 5 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Or_is__there_a_rule_on_this_page_that_no_change_can_be_made_without_first_posting_it_on_the_talk_page.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4]]
|-
| OriginalRemoving study?"the observed" || 15 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Original_study.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 24#Removing "the observed"]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| OtherCite for "#34;theorieschanges in populations of organisms over time"#34;? || 21 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Other_.22theories.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 14#Cite for "changes in populations of organisms over time"?]]
|-
| OutlineFor why doesn't it say "of how"? || Unknown4 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Outline|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 14#For why doesn't it say "of how"?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Pagefalsified serves no purposehypotheses || 108 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Page_serves__no_purpose|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 34#falsified hypotheses]]
|-
| PersistentTrue commentsin thataddition thisto article is confusedfactual || 115 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_5}}#Persistent_comments_that_this_article_is_confused|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 54#True in addition to factual]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| PleaseLooks returnlike thesome NPOVinconsistencies tagin the article || 1112 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Please_return_the_NPOV_tag|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 34#Looks like some inconsistencies in the article]]
|-
| PlumbingPurpose isof athis science and Cleaning Toilets is a religionArticle || 310 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Plumbing_is_a_science_and_Cleaning_Toilets_is_a_religion|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 14#Purpose of this Article]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Popper'sFact and falsifiabilityTheory || 220 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Popper's_falsifiability|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 24#Fact and Theory]]
|-
| PredictiveSource powerof ambiguity || 15 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Predictive_power|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 64#Source of ambiguity]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ProofControvercy || 135 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Proof|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 64#Controvercy]]
|-
| ProofRemoval inof "Related concepts and terminology"Text || 3 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Proof_in_.22Related_concepts_and_terminology.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 64#Removal of Text]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| The fact section doesn't seem to be parallel with the its main article || 34 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#The fact section doesn't seem to be parallel with the its main article]]
| Purported reason for deletion || 1 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Purported_reason_for_deletion|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1]]
|-
| PurposeWhat ofis this Articlearticle about? || 106 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Purpose_of_this_Article|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#What is this article about?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Quickchanges questionin populations of biological organisms over time || 43 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Quick_question|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 34#changes in populations of biological organisms over time]]
|-
| Dawkins tackles this more expicitly in his new book || 8 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#Dawkins tackles this more expicitly in his new book]]
| Redefines Wikipedia's own definition of "Theory" and "Fact" || 7 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory}}#Redefines_Wikipedia's_own_definition_of_.22Theory.22_and_.22Fact.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ReferenceSection erroron "Evolution compared with gravity" OR? || 3 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Reference_error|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 24#Section on "Evolution compared with gravity" OR?]]
|-
| RefutedEncouraging theoryuse of a logical fallacy? || 27 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Refuted_theory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 15#Encouraging use of a logical fallacy?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Reining this debate inCausation || 85 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Reining_this_debate_in|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 65#Causation]]
|-
| RemovalGravity ofand fruit Textflies || 3 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Removal_of_Text|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 45#Gravity and fruit flies]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Removing "the observed"Tone || 543 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Removing_.22the_observed.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 45#Tone]]
|-
| RemovingArticle paragraphby comparing evolution to gravityGregory || 472 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Removing_paragraph_comparing_evolution_to_gravity|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 65#Article by Gregory]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ResponseMeanings of the word 'evolution'. || 613 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Response|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 15#Meanings of the word 'evolution'.]]
|-
| RevisedDoes proposalthis inarticle fullproperly reflect the opinions of the quoted sources? || 1241 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Revised_proposal_in_full|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 65#Does this article properly reflect the opinions of the quoted sources?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ScientificFact theoriesvs. Theory || 112 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Scientific_theories|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Fact vs. Theory]]
|-
| SecondScientific paragraphtheories || 31 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Second_paragraph|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Scientific theories]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| SecondEvolutionary sentencetheory predicts novel inventions || 27 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Second_sentence|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 16#Evolutionary theory predicts novel inventions]]
|-
| Section on "Evolution asEvolutionary theory andpredicts factnovel in the literature"inventions || 47 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Section_on_.22Evolution_as_theory_and_fact_in_the_literature.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Evolutionary theory predicts novel inventions 2]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| SectionPredictive on "Evolution compared with gravity" OR?power || 315 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Section_on_.22Evolution_compared_with_gravity.22_OR.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 46#Predictive power]]
|-
| Semi-protecting the article?Proof || 113 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_1}}#Semi-protecting_the_article.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 16#Proof]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Serious problems with this fact and theory article || 6 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Serious_problems_with_this_fact_and_theory_article|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Serious problems with this fact and theory article]]
|-
| SeveralChanges suggestionsto lead || 32 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Several_suggestions|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Changes to lead]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| SomeBreak hitsin from "the other side"proposal || 28 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Some_hits_from_.22the_other_side.22|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Break in the proposal]]
|-
| SourceFirst of ambiguityparagraph || 153 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#Source_of_ambiguity|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 46#First paragraph]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Second paragraph || 3 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Second paragraph]]
| Supporting evidence for the fact of evolution -- also irrelevant to this article || 7 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Supporting_evidence_for_the_fact_of_evolution_--_also_irrelevant_to_this_article|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3]]
|-
| TheRevised Earthproposal Rotatesin Round the Sun: Fact?full || 12 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#The_Earth_Rotates_Round_the_Sun:_Fact.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Revised proposal in full]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Break - mathematical theory || 11 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Break - mathematical theory]]
| The fact section doesn't seem to be parallel with the its main article || 34 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#The_fact_section_doesn't_seem_to_be_parallel_with_the_its_main_article|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4]]
|-
| TheProof observedin changes"Related inconcepts populationsand terminology" || 3 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#The_observed_changes_in_populations|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Proof in "Related concepts and terminology"]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| TheUndid Realrevision Problemto H-W theory || 31 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#The_Real_Problem|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Undid revision to H-W theory]]
|-
| TheHardy-Weinberg Theory of Evolutioncontent is NOT Trueincorrect || 813 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#The_Theory_of_Evolution_is_NOT_True|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Hardy-Weinberg content is incorrect]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ThinningRemoving theparagraph citationscomparing inevolution theto leadgravity || 347 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Thinning_the_citations_in_the_lead|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Removing paragraph comparing evolution to gravity]]
|-
| ThisReining articlethis isdebate a rantin || 348 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#This_article_is_a_rant|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 36#Reining this debate in]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| To:Belief 65.87.184.50in theory || 2380 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#To:_65.87.184.50|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 26#Belief in theory]]
|-
| ToneA few comments || 437 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_5}}#Tone|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 57#A few comments]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| TooGerm difficulttheory toof editdiseases (betterin way?)the lead || 1 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_2}}#Too_difficult_to_edit_.28better_way.3F.29|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 27#Germ theory of diseases in the lead]]
|-
| TrueComparing in additionevolution to factualgravity || 510 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#True_in_addition_to_factual|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 47#Comparing evolution to gravity]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| UndidComparing revisionevolution to H-W theorygravity || 111 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_6}}#Undid_revision_to_H-W_theory|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 67#Comparing evolution to gravity 2]]
|-
| Redefines Wikipedia's own definition of "Theory" and "Fact" || 7 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Redefines Wikipedia's own definition of "Theory" and "Fact"]]
| Unencyclopedic || 6 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Unencyclopedic|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| View of those opposed to evolutioninductive/deductive || 132 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#View_of_those_opposed_to_evolution|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 37#inductive/deductive]]
|-
| What"Evolution is evolution?both fact and theory" - Nope not all scientists agree || 623 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#What_is_evolution.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 37#"Evolution is both fact and theory" - Nope not all scientists agree]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| WhatClarification ison this article about?fact || 61 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_4}}#What_is_this_article_about.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 47#Clarification on fact]]
|-
| WhoPhantom considers what fact?Citations || 58 || [[{{urlencode:Talk:Evolution_as_fact_and_theory/Archive_3}}#Who_considers_what_fact.3F|Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 37#Phantom Citations]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Suggestions to Improve This Article || 20 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Suggestions to Improve This Article]]
|-
| Evolution as theory and fact in the literature || 4 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Evolution as theory and fact in the literature]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Phenomena of evolution || 7 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Phenomena of evolution]]
|-
| FAQ question 4 || 36 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#FAQ question 4]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Recent change to lead || 2 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 8#Recent change to lead]]
|-
| Revisions to first section on fact || 1 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Revisions to first section on fact]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Review of fact || 1 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Review of fact]]
|-
| Obscurity || 4 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 8#Obscurity]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Removal of FAQ || 5 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 8#Removal of FAQ]]
|-
| Formal inference? || 14 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 8#Formal inference?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Material moved || 1 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory#Material moved]]
|-
| Return previous lead || 8 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 8#Return previous lead]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Defining evolution || 7 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory#Defining evolution]]
|-
| E as T&F "in the literature" || 2 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory#E as T&F "in the literature"]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Fitzhugh reworked || 1 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory#Fitzhugh reworked]]
|-
| Proposal to undo the removal of Prof Smiddy's quote || 7 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory#Proposal to undo the removal of Prof Smiddy's quote]]
|}
|