|
<!-- HBC Archive Indexerbot can blank this -->
Report generated based on a request from [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory]]. It matches the following masks: Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive <#>, Talk:Evolution as fact and theory.<br>
{{last edited by}}
<br />
It was generated at 01:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC) by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]].
{| class="sortable"
! Discussion Topic !! Replies (estimated) !! Archive Link
|-
| FormalPurported inference?reason for deletion || 141 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Formal%20inference%3FPurported reason for deletion]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| MaterialEvolution movednot a scientific fact? || 02 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Material%20movedEvolution not a scientific fact?]]
|-
| ReturnEvolution not a piece of data from previousan leadexperiment || 8 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Return%20previous%20leadEvolution not a piece of data from an experiment]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| DefiningMerge with Misunderstandings about evolution || 71 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Defining%20evolutionMerge with Misunderstandings about evolution]]
|-
| EMicroevolution as T&F "in theversus literature"macroevolution || 113 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#E%20as%20T%26F%20%22in%20the%20literature%22Microevolution versus macroevolution]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| PurportedPlumbing reasonis fora deletionscience and Cleaning Toilets is a religion || 13 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Purported%20reason%20for%20deletionPlumbing is a science and Cleaning Toilets is a religion]]
|-
| MoreIt Referencesseems to me that Evolution is a fact not a theory at all. || 08 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#More%20ReferencesIt seems to me that Evolution is a fact not a theory at all.]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| OutlineResponse || 06 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#OutlineResponse]]
|-
| EvolutionArticle notuses aincorrect definition of "scientific fact?" || 24 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Evolution%20not%20a%20scientific%20fact%3FArticle uses incorrect definition of "scientific fact"]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Evolution '''not''' a piece of data from anHair experimentsplitting || 83 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Evolution%20not%20a%20piece%20of%20data%20from%20an%20experimentHair splitting]]
|-
| MergeFact with [[Misunderstandings about evolution]]Quiz || 135 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Merge%20with%20Misunderstandings%20about%20evolutionFact Quiz]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Microevolution versus macroevolutionEdwards || 132 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Microevolution%20versus%20macroevolutionEdwards]]
|-
| PlumbingFundamental is a science and Cleaning Toilets is a religionflaw || 35 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Plumbing%20is%20a%20science%20and%20Cleaning%20Toilets%20is%20a%20religionFundamental flaw]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| It seems to me that Evolution is a fact not aRefuted theory at all. || 82 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#It%20seems%20to%20me%20that%20Evolution%20is%20a%20fact%20not%20a%20theory%20at%20all.Refuted theory]]
|-
| Response"Fact" || 62 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Response"Fact"]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ArticleSecond uses incorrect definition of "scientific fact"sentence || 42 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Article%20uses%20incorrect%20definition%20of%20%22scientific%20fact%22Second sentence]]
|-
| HairArticle splittingmissing a section? || 32 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Hair%20splittingArticle missing a section?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| FactOther Quiz"theories" || 352 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Fact%20QuizOther "theories"]]
|-
| Edwardsdefinition of evolution || 2 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Edwardsdefinition of evolution]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| FundamentalMisunderstanding flawof fact, theory, and everything in between || 513 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Fundamental%20flawMisunderstanding of fact, theory, and everything in between]]
|-
| RefutedMy theorychanges to The Terminology of Science || 23 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Refuted%20theoryMy changes to The Terminology of Science]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| "Fact"Creationist rant || 24 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#%22Fact%22Creationist rant]]
|-
| SecondSemi-protecting sentencethe article? || 21 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Second%20sentenceSemi-protecting the article?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ArticleInappropriate missingTone ain section? "Evolution as theory and fact in the literature" || 2 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Article%20missing%20a%20section%3FInappropriate Tone in section "Evolution as theory and fact in the literature"]]
|-
| Otherdirectly "theories"from first source || 24 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 1#Other%20%22theories%22directly from first source]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| definitionOriginal of evolutionstudy? || 21 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#definition%20of%20evolutionOriginal study?]]
|-
| MisunderstandingBiased oftowards fact, theory, and everything in betweenEvolution || 1320 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#Misunderstanding%20of%20fact%2C%20theory%2C%20and%20everything%20in%20betweenBiased towards Evolution]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| MyToo changesdifficult to ''Theedit Terminology(better of Science''way?) || 31 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#My%20changes%20to%20The%20Terminology%20of%20ScienceToo difficult to edit (better way?)]]
|-
| CreationistReference ranterror || 43 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#Creationist%20rantReference error]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Semi-protectingFacts theare article?a judgement call || 114 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#Semi-protecting%20the%20article%3FFacts are a judgement call]]
|-
| InappropriatePersistent Tonecomments inthat sectionthis "Evolution as theory and fact inarticle theis literature"confused || 218 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 15#Inappropriate%20Tone%20in%20section%20%22Evolution%20as%20theory%20and%20fact%20in%20the%20literature%22Persistent comments that this article is confused]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| directlyArticle fromon first sourceFacts || 45 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 12#directly%20from%20first%20sourceArticle on Facts]]
|-
| OriginalPopper's study?falsifiability || 12 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Original%20study%3FPopper's falsifiability]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| BiasedIs towardsa Evolutionfact || 208 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Biased%20towards%20EvolutionIs a fact]]
|-
| Too difficult to edit (better way?)Inaccuracies || 130 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Too%20difficult%20to%20edit%20%28better%20way%3F%29Inaccuracies]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ReferenceOne errorand the same claim can be both fact and theory || 31 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Reference%20errorOne and the same claim can be both fact and theory]]
|-
| FactsHow arethe aword judgementevolution callis used || 1410 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Facts%20are%20a%20judgement%20callHow the word evolution is used]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ArticleJust ona Factsthought || 53 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Article%20on%20FactsJust a thought]]
|-
| Popper'sDefine falsifiabilitywhat is meant by "evolution" || 23 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Popper%27s%20falsifiabilityDefine what is meant by "evolution"]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Is a factBrilliant || 82 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Is%20a%20factBrilliant]]
|-
| InaccuraciesTo: 65.87.184.50 || 3023 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#InaccuraciesTo: 65.87.184.50]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| OneBefore andyou theget sametoo claim can be ''both'' fact and theoryexcited || 135 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#One%20and%20the%20same%20claim%20can%20be%20both%20fact%20and%20theoryBefore you get too excited]]
|-
| HowSection theon word"Evolution evolutionas istheory usedand fact in the literature" || 104 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#How%20the%20word%20evolution%20is%20usedSection on "Evolution as theory and fact in the literature"]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| JustBoltzmann aH thoughtTheorem || 32 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Just%20a%20thoughtBoltzmann H Theorem]]
|-
| Definelaws what is meantand by "evolution"proof || 35 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#Define%20what%20is%20meant%20by%20%22evolution%22laws and proof]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| BrilliantBig Problem || 27 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#BrilliantBig Problem]]
|-
| To:Gravity 65.87.184.50as fact || 232 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 2#To%3A%2065.87.184.50Gravity as fact]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| BeforeNational youAcademy getof too excitedSciences || 355 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#Before%20you%20get%20too%20excitedNational Academy of Sciences]]
|-
| SectionGravity onand "Evolution as theory and fact in the literature" ???? || 421 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#Section%20on%20%22Evolution%20as%20theory%20and%20fact%20in%20the%20literature%22Gravity and Evolution ????]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| BoltzmannThis Harticle Theoremis a rant || 234 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#Boltzmann%20H%20TheoremThis article is a rant]]
|-
| lawsThe andobserved changes in proofpopulations || 53 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#laws%20and%20proofThe observed changes in populations]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| GravityAs asa factrebuttal to evolutionists creationists || 28 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#Gravity%20as%20factAs a rebuttal to evolutionists creationists]]
|-
| LogicNo original Research || 2912 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 23#LogicNo original Research]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| BigSome Problemhits from "the other side" || 72 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Big%20ProblemSome hits from "the other side"]]
|-
| NationalNPOV Academytag ofWAS Sciencesrecommended by AFD closure || 511 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#National%20Academy%20of%20SciencesNPOV tag WAS recommended by AFD closure]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| GravityView andof Evolutionthose ????opposed to evolution || 2113 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Gravity%20and%20Evolution%20%3F%3F%3F%3FView of those opposed to evolution]]
|-
| ThisPlease articlereturn isthe aNPOV ranttag || 3411 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#This%20article%20is%20a%20rantPlease return the NPOV tag]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| The'Theory' should observednot changesbe in populationscontradistinction to 'fact' || 310 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#The%20observed%20changes%20in%20populations'Theory' should not be in contradistinction to 'fact']]
|-
| AsWho aconsiders rebuttalwhat to <s>evolutionists</s> creationistsfact? || 85 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#As%20a%20rebuttal%20to%20%3Cs%3Eevolutionists%3C/s%3E%20creationistsWho considers what fact?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| NoThe originalTheory Researchof Evolution is NOT True || 128 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#No%20original%20ResearchThe Theory of Evolution is NOT True]]
|-
| SomeQuick hits from "the other side"question || 24 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Some%20hits%20from%20%22the%20other%20side%22Quick question]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| NPOV tag WAS recommended by AFD closureUnencyclopedic || 116 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#NPOV%20tag%20WAS%20recommended%20by%20AFD%20closureUnencyclopedic]]
|-
| ViewPage ofserves those opposedno to evolutionpurpose || 1310 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#View%20of%20those%20opposed%20to%20evolutionPage serves no purpose]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| PleaseAlternative return the NPOV tagsuggestion || 113 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Please%20return%20the%20NPOV%20tagAlternative suggestion]]
|-
| 'Theory'Another should not be in contradistinction to 'fact'suggestion || 1022 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#%27Theory%27%20should%20not%20be%20in%20contradistinction%20to%20%27fact%27Another suggestion]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| WhoWhat considersis what factevolution? || 56 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Who%20considers%20what%20fact%3FWhat is evolution?]]
|-
| The TheoryEarth ofRotates EvolutionRound isthe NOTSun: TrueFact? || 812 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#The%20Theory%20of%20Evolution%20is%20NOT%20True Earth Rotates Round the Sun: Fact?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Quick questionLogic || 429 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 32#Quick%20questionLogic]]
|-
| UnencyclopedicSeveral suggestions || 63 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#UnencyclopedicSeveral suggestions]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| PageGreat servesarticle ... nokeep purposeit || 102 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Page%20serves%20%20no%20purposeGreat article ... keep it]]
|-
| AlternativeThinning suggestionthe citations in the lead || 3 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Alternative%20suggestionThinning the citations in the lead]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| AnotherEvolution suggestionis not a theory. Evolutionary theory is a theory. || 227 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Another%20suggestionEvolution is not a theory. Evolutionary theory is a theory.]]
|-
| WhatExplanation isof evolution?restored sentence || 61 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#What%20is%20evolution%3FExplanation of restored sentence]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| TheMuller Earthand RotatesGould Roundquotes theare Sun: Fact?contradictory || 125 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#The%20Earth%20Rotates%20Round%20the%20Sun%3A%20Fact%3FMuller and Gould quotes are contradictory]]
|-
| SeveralThe suggestionsReal Problem || 3 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Several%20suggestionsThe Real Problem]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| GreatInclusion articleof ... keep itpolls || 217 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Great%20article%20...%20keep%20itInclusion of polls]]
|-
| ThinningA the citations in the leadjoke || 3 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Thinning%20the%20citations%20in%20the%20leadA joke]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| EvolutionObjections isto notthe afact theory.of Evolutionaryevolution theory- isIrrelevant afor theory.this article || 74 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Evolution%20is%20not%20a%20theory.%20Evolutionary%20theory%20is%20a%20theory.Objections to the fact of evolution - Irrelevant for this article]]
|-
| ExplanationSupporting evidence for the fact of restoredevolution sentence-- also irrelevant to this article || 17 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Explanation%20of%20restored%20sentenceSupporting evidence for the fact of evolution -- also irrelevant to this article]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| MullerIntroduction andof Gouldfallacious quotesmaterial areinto contradictorythe article || 58 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 3#Muller%20and%20Gould%20quotes%20are%20contradictoryIntroduction of fallacious material into the article]]
|-
| TheOr Realis Problem there a rule on this page that no change can be made without first posting it on the talk page? || 35 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 34#The%20Real%20ProblemOr is there a rule on this page that no change can be made without first posting it on the talk page?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Inclusion"Which meaning of pollsevolution is intended, if it is not explicit, can be discerned by the context." || 1739 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 34#"Which meaning of evolution is intended, if it is not explicit, can be discerned by the context.&#Inclusion%20of%20polls34;]]
|-
| AConcern jokeregarding first paragraph || 317 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 34#A%20jokeConcern regarding first paragraph]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ObjectionsA togeneral the fact of evolution - Irrelevant for this articlereminder. || 41 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 34#Objections%20to%20the%20fact%20of%20evolution%20-%20Irrelevant%20for%20this%20articleA general reminder.]]
|-
| Supporting evidence forRemoving "the fact of evolution -- also irrelevant to this articleobserved" || 75 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 34#Removing "the observed&#Supporting%20evidence%20for%20the%20fact%20of%20evolution%20--%20also%20irrelevant%20to%20this%20article34;]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| IntroductionCite offor fallacious"changes materialin intopopulations theof articleorganisms over time"? || 81 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 34#Cite for "changes in populations of organisms over time&#Introduction%20of%20fallacious%20material%20into%20the%20article34;?]]
|-
| OrFor iswhy there a rule on this page that no change can be made without first postingdoesn't it onsay the"of talk pagehow"? || 54 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#Or%20is%20%20there%20a%20rule%20on%20this%20page%20that%20no%20change%20can%20be%20made%20without%20first%20posting%20it%20on%20the%20talk%20page%3FFor why doesn't it say "of how"?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Obscurityfalsified hypotheses || 48 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 84# Obscurityfalsified hypotheses]] ▼| "Which meaning of evolution is intended, if it is not explicit, can be discerned by the context." || 39 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#%22Which%20meaning%20of%20evolution%20is%20intended%2C%20if%20it%20is%20not%20explicit%2C%20can%20be%20discerned%20by%20the%20context.%22]]
|-
| ConcernTrue regardingin firstaddition paragraphto factual || 175 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#Concern%20regarding%20first%20paragraphTrue in addition to factual]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ALooks generallike reminder.some inconsistencies in the article || 112 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#A%20general%20reminder.Looks like some inconsistencies in the article]]
|-
| RemovingPurpose "theof observed"this Article || 510 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#Removing%20%22the%20observed%22Purpose of this Article]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| CiteFact for "changes in populations of organisms overand time"?Theory || 120 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#Cite%20for%20%22changes%20in%20populations%20of%20organisms%20over%20time%22%3FFact and Theory]]
|-
| ForSource why doesn't it say "of how"?ambiguity || 415 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#For%20why%20doesn%27t%20it%20say%20%22of%20how%22%3FSource of ambiguity]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| falsified hypothesesControvercy || 85 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#falsified%20hypothesesControvercy]]
|-
| TrueRemoval inof addition to factualText || 53 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#True%20in%20addition%20to%20factualRemoval of Text]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| LooksThe likefact section doesn't seem to somebe inconsistenciesparallel inwith the its main article || 1234 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#Looks%20like%20some%20inconsistencies%20in%20the%20articleThe fact section doesn't seem to be parallel with the its main article]]
|-
| PurposeWhat ofis this Articlearticle about? || 106 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#Purpose%20of%20this%20ArticleWhat is this article about?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Factchanges andin populations of biological organisms over Theorytime || 203 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#Fact%20and%20Theorychanges in populations of biological organisms over time]]
|-
| SourceDawkins oftackles ambiguitythis more expicitly in his new book || 158 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#Source%20of%20ambiguityDawkins tackles this more expicitly in his new book]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ControvercySection on "Evolution compared with gravity" OR? || 53 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 4#ControvercySection on "Evolution compared with gravity" OR?]]
|-
| RemovalEncouraging use of Texta logical fallacy? || 37 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 45#Removal%20of%20TextEncouraging use of a logical fallacy?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| The fact section doesn't seem to be parallel with the its main articleCausation || 345 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 45#The%20fact%20section%20doesn%27t%20seem%20to%20be%20parallel%20with%20the%20its%20main%20articleCausation]]
|-
| WhatGravity is thisand articlefruit about?flies || 63 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 45#What%20is%20this%20article%20about%3FGravity and fruit flies]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| changes in populations of biological organisms over timeTone || 343 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 45#changes%20in%20populations%20of%20biological%20organisms%20over%20timeTone]]
|-
| DawkinsArticle tacklesby this more expicitly in his new bookGregory || 82 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 45#Dawkins%20tackles%20this%20more%20expicitly%20in%20his%20new%20bookArticle by Gregory]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| SectionMeanings onof "Evolutionthe comparedword with gravity" OR?'evolution'. || 313 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 45#Meanings of the word 'evolution&#Section%20on%20%22Evolution%20compared%20with%20gravity%22%20OR%3F39;.]]
|-
| EncouragingDoes usethis article properly reflect the opinions of athe logicalquoted fallacysources? || 741 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 5#Encouraging%20use%20of%20a%20logical%20fallacy%3FDoes this article properly reflect the opinions of the quoted sources?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| CausationFact vs. Theory || 512 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 56#CausationFact vs. Theory]]
|-
| GravityScientific and fruit fliestheories || 31 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 56#Gravity%20and%20fruit%20fliesScientific theories]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ToneEvolutionary theory predicts novel inventions || 437 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 56#ToneEvolutionary theory predicts novel inventions]]
|-
| ArticleEvolutionary bytheory predicts novel Gregoryinventions || 27 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 56#Article%20by%20GregoryEvolutionary theory predicts novel inventions 2]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| MeaningsPredictive of the word 'evolution'.power || 1315 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 56#Meanings%20of%20the%20word%20%27evolution%27.Predictive power]]
|-
| Persistent comments that this article is confusedProof || 1813 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 56#Persistent%20comments%20that%20this%20article%20is%20confusedProof]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| DoesSerious thisproblems articlewith properlythis reflectfact theand opinionstheory of the quoted sources?article || 416 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 56#Does%20this%20article%20properly%20reflect%20the%20opinions%20of%20the%20quoted%20sources%3FSerious problems with this fact and theory article]]
|-
| FactChanges vs.to Theorylead || 122 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Fact%20vs.%20TheoryChanges to lead]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ScientificBreak theoriesin the proposal || 18 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Scientific%20theoriesBreak in the proposal]]
|-
| EvolutionaryFirst theory predicts novel inventionsparagraph || 73 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Evolutionary%20theory%20predicts%20novel%20inventionsFirst paragraph]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| PredictiveSecond powerparagraph || 153 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Predictive%20powerSecond paragraph]]
|-
| EvolutionaryRevised theoryproposal predictsin novel inventionsfull || 712 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Evolutionary%20theory%20predicts%20novel%20inventionsRevised proposal in full]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ProofBreak - mathematical theory || 1311 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#ProofBreak - mathematical theory]]
|-
| SeriousProof problemsin with"Related this factconcepts and theory articleterminology" || 63 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Serious%20problems%20with%20this%20fact%20and%20theory%20articleProof in "Related concepts and terminology"]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ChangesUndid revision to leadH-W theory || 21 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Changes%20to%20leadUndid revision to H-W theory]]
|-
| BreakHardy-Weinberg incontent theis proposalincorrect || 813 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Break%20in%20the%20proposalHardy-Weinberg content is incorrect]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| FirstRemoving paragraph comparing evolution to gravity || 347 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#First%20paragraphRemoving paragraph comparing evolution to gravity]]
|-
| SecondReining paragraphthis debate in || 38 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Second%20paragraphReining this debate in]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Revised proposalBelief in fulltheory || 1280 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 6#Revised%20proposal%20in%20fullBelief in theory]]
|-
| BreakA -few mathematical theorycomments || 117 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 67#Break%20-%20mathematical%20theoryA few comments]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ProofGerm intheory "Relatedof conceptsdiseases andin the terminology"lead || 31 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 67#Proof%20in%20%22Related%20concepts%20and%20terminology%22Germ theory of diseases in the lead]]
|-
| UndidComparing revisionevolution to H-W theorygravity || 110 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 67#Undid%20revision%20to%20H-W%20theoryComparing evolution to gravity]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Hardy-WeinbergComparing contentevolution isto incorrectgravity || 1311 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 67#Hardy-Weinberg%20content%20is%20incorrectComparing evolution to gravity 2]]
|-
| RemovingRedefines paragraphWikipedia's comparingown evolutiondefinition toof gravity"Theory" and "Fact" || 477 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 67#Redefines Wikipedia's own definition of "Theory" and "Fact&#Removing%20paragraph%20comparing%20evolution%20to%20gravity34;]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Reining this debate ininductive/deductive || 82 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 67#Reining%20this%20debate%20ininductive/deductive]]
|-
| Belief"Evolution inis both fact and theory" - Nope not all scientists agree || 8023 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 67#Belief%20in%20theory"Evolution is both fact and theory" - Nope not all scientists agree]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| AClarification fewon commentsfact || 71 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#A%20few%20commentsClarification on fact]]
|-
| GermPhantom theory of diseases in the leadCitations || 18 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Germ%20theory%20of%20diseases%20in%20the%20leadPhantom Citations]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Comparing evolutionSuggestions to gravityImprove This Article || 1020 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Comparing%20evolution%20to%20gravitySuggestions to Improve This Article]]
|-
| RedefinesEvolution Wikipedia'sas owntheory definitionand offact "Theory"in andthe "Fact"literature || 74 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Redefines%20Wikipedia%27s%20own%20definition%20of%20%22Theory%22%20and%20%22Fact%22Evolution as theory and fact in the literature]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Redefines Wikipedia's own definitionPhenomena of "Theory" and "Fact"evolution || 7 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Redefines%20Wikipedia%27s%20own%20definition%20of%20%22Theory%22%20and%20%22Fact%22Phenomena of evolution]]
|-
| inductive/deductiveFAQ question 4 || 236 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#inductive/deductiveFAQ question 4]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| "EvolutionRecent ischange bothto fact and theory" - <del>Nope</del> not all scientists agreelead || 232 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 78#%22Evolution%20is%20both%20fact%20and%20theory%22%20-%20%3Cdel%3ENope%3C/del%3E%20not%20all%20scientists%20agreeRecent change to lead]]
|-
| ClarificationRevisions to first section on fact || 1 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Clarification%20on%20factRevisions to first section on fact]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| PhantomReview Citationsof fact || 81 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Phantom%20CitationsReview of fact]]
|-
| Comparing evolution to gravityObscurity || 114 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 78#Comparing%20evolution%20to%20gravityObscurity]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Evolution as theory and fact inRemoval theof literatureFAQ || 45 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 78#Evolution%20as%20theory%20and%20fact%20in%20the%20literatureRemoval of FAQ]]
|-
| SuggestionsFormal to Improve This Articleinference? || 2014 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 78#Suggestions%20to%20Improve%20This%20ArticleFormal inference?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| PhenomenaMaterial of evolutionmoved || 71 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#Phenomena%20of%20evolutionMaterial moved]]
|-
| TermsReturn ofprevious reference of FAQlead || 08 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 78#Terms%20of%20reference%20of%20FAQReturn previous lead]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| RevisionsDefining to first section on factevolution || 17 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive#Defining 7#Revisions%20to%20first%20section%20on%20factevolution]]
|-
| ReviewE ofas factT&F "in the literature" || 12 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive#E as T&F "in the 7literature&#Review%20of%20fact34;]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| FAQFitzhugh question 4reworked || 361 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 7#FAQ%20question%204Fitzhugh reworked]]
|-
| Recent change to lead || 2 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 8#Recent%20change%20to%20lead]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
▲| Obscurity || 4 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive 8#Obscurity]]
|-
| RemovalProposal to undo the removal of FAQProf Smiddy's quote || 57 || [[Talk:Evolution as fact and theory/Archive#Proposal 8to undo the removal of Prof Smiddy&#Removal%20of%20FAQ39;s quote]]
|}
| 