Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spatial complexity: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Loew Galitz (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Scottywong (talk | contribs) →Spatial complexity: Closed as delete (XFDcloser) |
||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Spatial complexity]]===▼
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. [[User talk:Scottywong|<span style="font:bold 15px 'Bradley Hand','Bradley Hand ITC';color:#044;text-shadow:0 0 4px #033,0 0 10px #077;"> —⁠Scotty<span style="color:#fff;">Wong</span>⁠— </span>]] 15:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
▲===[[:Spatial complexity]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Spatial complexity}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spatial complexity|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 December 1#{{anchorencode:Spatial complexity}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1056975319/cur|edits since nomination]])
Line 32 ⟶ 37:
***The "definition" is completely empty. It imparts no information to the reader. The different sources thrown into the page all define "complexity" in different ways, when they bother to give it even a semi-quantitative definition at all. This page offers nothing but an illusion of coherence. [[User:XOR'easter|XOR'easter]] ([[User talk:XOR'easter|talk]]) 00:25, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
****I already agreed the article sucks. I was going to fix it quickly, but decided it is easier to change my vote :-) By the way there is nothing wrong with apparently "empty" definition, as long as it is subsequently elaborated. Take for example "[[Computational complexity]]": "the computational complexity or simply complexity of an algorithm is the amount of resources required to run it." I say it is just as empty as it can be, if taken in isolation. (What resources? electricity? sheets of paper? beer? ... ) Continuing to read the lede will not make you wiser. Some statements are gibberish or even false in general. [[User:Loew Galitz|Loew Galitz]] ([[User talk:Loew Galitz|talk]]) 01:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||