Life Extension: A Practical Scientific Approach: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:08, 17 January 2020

Latest revision as of 22:05, 19 January 2022

(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|1982 book by Durk Pearson and Sandy Shaw}}

{{italic title}}

{{Infobox book

| name = Editing Life Extension: A Practical Scientific Approach

| image = Life Extension - A Practical Scientific Approach cover.jpg

| caption =

| author = [[Durk Pearson]],<br>[[Sandy Shaw (writer)|Sandy Shaw]]

| illustrator =

| cover_artist =

| country = USA

| language = English

| series =

| release_number =

| subject = [[longevity]]

| genre =

| publisher = [[Warner Books]]

| publisher2 =

| pub_date = {{start date and age|1982}}

| published =

| media_type =

| pages = 858

| awards =

| isbn = 0-446-51229-X

| isbn_note =

| oclc =

| dewey =

| congress =

| preceded_by =

| followed_by = The Life Extension Companion

}}

'''''Life Extension: A Practical Scientific Approach''''' is a 1982 book ({{ISBN|0-446-51229-X}}) by [[Durk Pearson]] and [[Sandy Shaw (writer)|Sandy Shaw]] that popularized the [[life extension]] and [[Nootropic|smart drug]] movements.<ref>See ''Rapture: How Biotech Became the New Religion'', by Brian S. Alexander, New York: Basic Books, 2003, {{ISBN|0-7382-0761-6}}, pp. 5&ndash;6.</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Katherine |last=Bishop |publisher=[[Seattle Post-Intelligencer]] newspaper|title=FDA fears smart drugs could pose stupid risks |date=1992-06-11 |accessdate=2007-03-01 |url=http://docs.newsbank.com/openurl?ctx_ver=z39.88-2004&rft_id=info:sid/iw.newsbank.com:AWNB:SPIB&rft_val_format=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rft_dat=0EB04A057A2FC5B9&svc_dat=InfoWeb:aggregated4&req_dat=0D0CB57AB53DF815 }}</ref>

Line 7 ⟶ 36:

== Criticism ==

Prominent aging researchers expressed mostly negative opinions of the book.

[[Leonard Hayflick]] deemed it "a glib, superficial overview of the field.,“ adding that he "would be very unhappy to learn that there were substantial numbers of people depending on its contents for guidance.”<ref [[Denham Harman]], to whom the book was dedicated and whose free radical theory of aging was favored by Pearson and Shaw, opined, name="I think basically the book is sound.jackovich"<ref>{{cite web |author1=Karen G. Jackovich |title=Two Fitness Faddists Have a No. 1 Best-Seller, but Are They Stretching Life Spans or Truth? |url=https://people.com/archive/two-fitness-faddists-have-a-no-1-best-seller-but-are-they-stretching-life-spans-or-truth-vol-18-no-14/ |website=people.com |accessdate=8 September 2019 |date=October 4, 1982}}</ref> But at the same time, [[Denham Harman]], to whom the book was dedicated and whose [[free radical theory of aging]] was favored by Pearson and Shaw, opined, "I think basically the book is sound," and added "It’s nice to see a book on aging on the best-seller lists."<ref name="jackovich" />

[[Roy Walford]] wrote, "[[gerontology]] has always been the happy hunting ground for faddists, charlatans, pseudoscientific fringe characters, and just misinformed enthusiasts with 'ready cures' for aging. ... Pearson and Shaw are among this long list of enthusiasts. ... Most of the Pearson/Shaw book relies on this lower-order category of evidence, and upon the testimonial posturing of Pearson and Shaw themselves."<ref name=Walford>{{cite book|last=Walford|first=Roy|title=Beyond the 120 Year Diet: How to Double Your Vital Years|year=2000|publisher=Four Walls Eight Windows|___location=New York, NY|isbn= 9781568581576|pages=[https://archive.org/details/beyond120yeardie00walf/page/21 21]–23|url=https://archive.org/details/beyond120yeardie00walf|url-access=registration}}</ref> (At one time Walford was a partner in a company, Gerontix, selling supplements to combat aging and improve health.)

Line 18 ⟶ 47:

{{Life extension}}

[[Category:1982Books non-fictionabout bookslife extension]]

[[Category:Dieting books]]

[[Category:Life1982 extensionnon-fiction books]]