<!-- HBC Archive Indexerbot can blank this -->
Report generated based on a request from [[Template talk:IPstack]]. It matches the following masks: Template talk:IPstack/Archive <#>, Template talk:IPstack.<br>
{{last edited by}}
<br />
It was generated at 04:47, 25 October 2016 (UTC) by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]].
{| class="sortable"
! Discussion Topic !! Replies (estimated) !! Archive Link
|-
| LDAPColors || 1 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#LDAPColors]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| RPCConfusing protocols || 32 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#RPCConfusing protocols]]
|-
| SSH and TLS/SSL do not belong togetherConfusing? || 23 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#SSH%20and%20TLS/SSL%20do%20not%20belong%20togetherConfusing?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| NDPARP || 2 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#NDPARP]]
|-
| Routing protocolsDHCP || 2 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Routing%20protocolsDHCP]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| NetworkMajor / Link Layer Muddlechange || 23 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Network%20/%20Link%20Layer%20MuddleMajor change]]
|-
| ARP/NDPChoice areof not L2 protocolslayers || 18 || [[Template talk:IPstack#ARP/NDP%20are%20not%20L2%20protocolsArchive 1#Choice of layers]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| OSPFWebsphere is not a layer 2 protocolMQ || 72 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#OSPF%20is%20not%20a%20layer%202%20protocolWebsphere MQ]]
|-
| layerPhysical for OSPFlayer || 2 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Physical layer%20for%20OSPF]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| EASCombine inData conflictLink withand thePhysical purpose of this template?layers || 182 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#EAS%20in%20conflict%20with%20the%20purpose%20of%20this%20template%3FCombine Data Link and Physical layers]]
|-
| Confusing?Encapsulation || 31 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Confusing%3FEncapsulation]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ColorsSpam || 1 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#ColorsSpam]]
|-
| ConfusingMiddleware/Infrastructure for DNS and DHCP, Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) protocolsetc.? || 29 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Confusing%20protocolsMiddleware/Infrastructure for DNS and DHCP, Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) etc.?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ARPBittorrent? || 32 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#ARPBittorrent?]]
|-
| DHCPNew navigation for network related topics? || 31 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#DHCPNew navigation for network related topics?]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| PhysicalFive layer model || 34 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Physical%20layerFive layer model]]
|-
| MajorInternet changeprotocols above the application layer || 62 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Major%20changeInternet protocols above the application layer]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Choice ofTemplate layersoveruse || 83 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Choice%20of%20layersTemplate overuse]]
|-
| TemplateEncryption overuseLayer || 43 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Template%20overuseEncryption Layer]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| WebsphereDiagram MQis completely broken, since transport layer is misssing || 21 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Websphere%20MQDiagram is completely broken, since transport layer is misssing]]
|-
| Combine Data Link and PhysicalSix layers ?! || 21 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Combine%20Data%20Link%20and%20Physical%20layersSix layers ?!]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| [[Encapsulation]]Layer pages || 1 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#EncapsulationLayer pages]]
|-
| Spamlayers all wrong || 17 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Spamlayers all wrong]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Middleware/InfrastructureNo forprimary DNSor andstrong DHCP,secondary Bordersource Gatewayuses Protocolfive (BGP) etc.?layers || 93 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Middleware/Infrastructure%20for%20DNS%20and%20DHCP%2C%20Border%20Gateway%20Protocol%20%28BGP%29%20etc.%3FNo primary or strong secondary source uses five layers]]
|-
| Bittorrent?OSI Model vs TCP/IP Model || 21 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Bittorrent%3FOSI Model vs TCP/IP Model]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| NewTCP/IP navigation for network related topics?model || 13 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#New%20navigation%20for%20network%20related%20topics%3FTCP/IP model]]
|-
| Five layer modelAnalysis || 46 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Five%20layer%20modelAnalysis]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| InternetOSPF protocolsand above the application layerBGP || 25 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Internet%20protocols%20above%20the%20application%20layerOSPF and BGP]]
|-
| Encryption LayerNavbox || 36 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Encryption%20LayerNavbox]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| Diagramtemplate is completely broken, since transport layer is misssingbloat || 110 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Diagram%20is%20completely%20broken%2C%20since%20transport%20layer%20is%20misssingtemplate bloat]]
|-
| SixPhysical layersLayer ?!protocols || 12 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Six%20layers%20%3F%21Physical Layer protocols]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| LayerOSPF pagesis a layer 3 protocol not a link layer protocol || 18 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Layer%20pagesOSPF is a layer 3 protocol not a link layer protocol]]
|-
| layers all wrongdns || 82 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#layers%20all%20wrongdns]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| NoRTP primaryprotocol or strong secondary source uses five layerslayer || 32 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#No%20primary%20or%20strong%20secondary%20source%20uses%20five%20layersRTP protocol layer]]
|-
| OSIIncluding ModelRADIUS vsand TCP/IP ModelDIAMETER || 12 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#OSI%20Model%20vs%20TCP/IP%20ModelIncluding RADIUS and DIAMETER]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| TCP/IP modelTRILL || 3 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#TCP/IP%20modelTRILL]]
|-
| AnalysisOSPF is a layer 7 protocol || 63 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#AnalysisOSPF is a layer 7 protocol]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| OSPFWhere anddo BGPwe put this? || 53 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#OSPF%20and%20BGPWhere do we put this?]]
|-
| NavboxRTP || 63 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#NavboxRTP]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| template bloatRPC || 103 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#template%20bloatRPC]]
|-
| Physical Layer protocolsTLS/SSL || 2 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Physical%20Layer%20protocolsTLS/SSL]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| OSPF is a layer 3 protocol not a link layer protocolLDAP || 81 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#OSPF%20is%20a%20layer%203%20protocol%20not%20a%20link%20layer%20protocolLDAP]]
|-
| dnsSSH and TLS/SSL do not belong together || 2 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#dnsSSH and TLS/SSL do not belong together]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| RTP protocol layerNDP || 2 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#RTP%20protocol%20layerNDP]]
|-
| IncludingRouting RADIUS and DIAMETERprotocols || 2 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Including%20RADIUS%20and%20DIAMETERRouting protocols]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| TRILLNetwork / Link Layer Muddle || 32 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#TRILLNetwork / Link Layer Muddle]]
|-
| OSPFARP/NDP isare anot layerL2 7 protocolprotocols || 31 || [[Template talk:IPstack#ARP/ArchiveNDP 1#OSPF%20is%20a%20layer%207%20protocolare not L2 protocols]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| WhereOSPF dois wenot puta this?layer 2 protocol || 312 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#Where%20do%20we%20put%20this%3FOSPF is not a layer 2 protocol]]
|-
| RTPlayer for OSPF || 32 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#RTPlayer for OSPF]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| TLS/SSLEAS in conflict with the purpose of this template? || 218 || [[Template talk:IPstack/Archive 1#TLS/SSLEAS in conflict with the purpose of this template?]]
|-
| DHCPv6 || 1 || [[Template talk:IPstack#DHCPv6]]
|- style="background: #dddddd;"
| ARP belongs to link layer?? || 23 || [[Template talk:IPstack#ARP belongs to link layer??]]
|-
| Requested move 20 January 2022 || 2 || [[Template talk:IPstack#Requested move 20 January 2022]]
|}
|