Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Model United Nations Development Programme: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Model United Nations Development Programme: '''Merge''' into Model United Nations. There is some useful content, but this forum is not notable, and the only two sources are not independent. If it could be sourced better, I'd chan |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''merge to [[Model United Nations]]'''. [[User:Shimeru|Shimeru]] ([[User talk:Shimeru|talk]]) 06:08, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
===[[Model United Nations Development Programme]]===
:{{la|Model United Nations Development Programme}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Model United Nations Development Programme|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 April
:({{findsources|Model United Nations Development Programme}})
Tries to assert notability, but there are not enough reliable sources per [[WP:GNG]]. Seems almost like a club website. Although in terms of AfD this isn't a valid argument, there are many much larger conferences such as the UCLA and Berkeley Model UN Conferences, as well as Stanford and Harvard that draw over a thousand participants from all over the world, and still don't have enough reliable sources. ''[[User:NativeForeigner|NativeForeigner]]'' <sup>[[User talk:NativeForeigner|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/NativeForeigner|Contribs]]</sub> 22:18, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Line 8 ⟶ 14:
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Organizations|list of Organizations-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)</small>
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Turkey|list of Turkey-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)</small>
*'''Merge''' into [[Model United Nations]]. There is some useful content, but this
<hr style="width:50%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:00, 25 April 2010 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||