Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prepared singleton pattern: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:43, 4 June 2007

Latest revision as of 12:34, 1 February 2022

(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

===[[Prepared singleton pattern]]===

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''<span style="color:red;">d</span>elete'''. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 21:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

===[[Prepared singleton pattern]]===

:{{la|Prepared singleton pattern}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prepared singleton pattern|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 June 4#{{anchorencode:Prepared singleton pattern}}|View log]])</noinclude>

Procedural nomination, completion of user [[User:Wikidrone|Wikidrone]]'s [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Prepared_singleton_pattern&diff=135414544&oldid=77353502 incomplete nomination]. Wikidrone gave the following reasoning: "This does no differ significantly from normal singleton". '''Abstain.''' [[User:Tobias Bergemann|Tobias Bergemann]] 13:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

* '''Weak delete'''. Only use of this phrase I see for this meaning is in the book used as a reference, and mirrors of wikipedia. The same name is used for a different meaning in the context of [[informix]]. I disagree with the nominator that this is no different from the "normal" singleton pattern, as the usual way of implementing singleton is using on-demand instantiation, which can be a problem in real-time programming, hence this solution to the problem. I don't think it's particularly important, though, because it just says "to avoid the problems with on-demand instantiation, don't use on-demand instantiation." Well, duh. If we want to keep this, we need to show that the term is in widespread use. [[User:JulesH|JulesH]] 14:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. This is minor implementation detail (like for example destruction or resurrection policy for a singleton). The term is not used IRL. [[User:Pavel Vozenilek|Pavel Vozenilek]] 16:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Jayvdb|John Vandenberg]] 21:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)</small>

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>