Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einstein (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:58, 13 February 2011

Latest revision as of 14:24, 2 February 2022

(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. '''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 15:18, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

===[[Einstein (programming language)]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}

:{{la|Einstein (programming language)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einstein (programming language)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 February 13#{{anchorencode:Einstein (programming language)}}|View log]]</noinclude>)

:({{Find sources|Einstein (programming language)}})

This language fails to meet the general notability guideline. This is the *only* information I could find about the language: [http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/06/Einstein]. The link to its homepage from that article redirects to a company that doesn't even sell the product. [[User:Christopher Monsanto|Christopher Monsanto]] ([[User talk:Christopher Monsanto|talk]]) 00:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Cybercobra|<b><font colorstyle="color:#3773A5;">Cyber</font></b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#FFB521;">cobra</fontspan>]] [[User talk:Cybercobra|(talk)]] 00:37, 13 February 2011 (UTC)</small>

*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Cybercobra|<b><font colorstyle="color:#3773A5;">Cyber</font></b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#FFB521;">cobra</fontspan>]] [[User talk:Cybercobra|(talk)]] 00:38, 13 February 2011 (UTC)</small>

*'''Delete''' per [[WP:NOTADVERTISING]]. Author could pretty much use his own userspace for this matter. There are lots of non-notable programming languages that appear every month. Some get fluctuating between low amount of users who keep using it from time to time. Definitely fails to meet guidelines to be kept as an article. [[User:Userpd|Userpd]] ([[User talk:Userpd|talk]]) 14:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

'''Keep''' because nothing good ever came of a deletion spree. [[User:Ubernostrum|Ubernostrum]] ([[User talk:Ubernostrum|talk]]) 03:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

'''Keep''', per my reasoning [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/XMLmosaic&action=historysubmit&diff=413815239&oldid=413775057 here] [[User:Throwaway85|Throwaway85]] ([[User talk:Throwaway85|talk]]) 04:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. There are no reliable secondary sources supplied that establish notability or support the claims made in the article. Doesn't even have a homepage anymore? How is it possible for anyone to verify the contents of this article? If it's impossible to verify any of the claims then it needs to go. [[User:SQGibbon|SQGibbon]] ([[User talk:SQGibbon|talk]]) 08:41, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

*'''Delete.''' No indication of importance or significance, and no sources could be located. <code>[[User:Decltype|decltype]]</code> <small>([[User talk:Decltype|talk]])</small> 08:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. I have attempted to find any reliable academic sources and came up empty. --[[User:Mukkakukaku|<span style="color:#006600;">'''M'''û'''ĸĸ'''â'''ĸ'''û'''ĸ'''â'''ĸ'''û</span>]] _{<small>([[User talk: Mukkakukaku|blah?]])</small>} 08:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

:: I should also note that [[User:Ubernostrum]] and [[User:Throwaway85]] above have posted the above verbatim comments on every one of the programming language AfDs that has come up in the past week. --[[User:Mukkakukaku|<span style="color:#006600;">'''M'''û'''ĸĸ'''â'''ĸ'''û'''ĸ'''â'''ĸ'''û</span>]] _{<small>([[User talk: Mukkakukaku|blah?]])</small>} 08:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>