Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einstein (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:18, 20 February 2011

Latest revision as of 14:24, 2 February 2022

(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 11:

:({{Find sources|Einstein (programming language)}})

This language fails to meet the general notability guideline. This is the *only* information I could find about the language: [http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/06/Einstein]. The link to its homepage from that article redirects to a company that doesn't even sell the product. [[User:Christopher Monsanto|Christopher Monsanto]] ([[User talk:Christopher Monsanto|talk]]) 00:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Cybercobra|<b><font colorstyle="color:#3773A5;">Cyber</font></b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#FFB521;">cobra</fontspan>]] [[User talk:Cybercobra|(talk)]] 00:37, 13 February 2011 (UTC)</small>

*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Cybercobra|<b><font colorstyle="color:#3773A5;">Cyber</font></b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#FFB521;">cobra</fontspan>]] [[User talk:Cybercobra|(talk)]] 00:38, 13 February 2011 (UTC)</small>

*'''Delete''' per [[WP:NOTADVERTISING]]. Author could pretty much use his own userspace for this matter. There are lots of non-notable programming languages that appear every month. Some get fluctuating between low amount of users who keep using it from time to time. Definitely fails to meet guidelines to be kept as an article. [[User:Userpd|Userpd]] ([[User talk:Userpd|talk]]) 14:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

'''Keep''' because nothing good ever came of a deletion spree. [[User:Ubernostrum|Ubernostrum]] ([[User talk:Ubernostrum|talk]]) 03:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Line 22:

*'''Delete.''' No indication of importance or significance, and no sources could be located. <code>[[User:Decltype|decltype]]</code> <small>([[User talk:Decltype|talk]])</small> 08:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. I have attempted to find any reliable academic sources and came up empty. --[[User:Mukkakukaku|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">[[User:Mukkakukaku|'''M'''û'''ĸĸ'''â'''ĸ'''û'''ĸ'''â'''ĸ'''û]]</fontspan>]] _{<small>([[User talk: Mukkakukaku|blah?]])</small>} 08:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

:: I should also note that [[User:Ubernostrum]] and [[User:Throwaway85]] above have posted the above verbatim comments on every one of the programming language AfDs that has come up in the past week. --[[User:Mukkakukaku|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">[[User:Mukkakukaku|'''M'''û'''ĸĸ'''â'''ĸ'''û'''ĸ'''â'''ĸ'''û]]</fontspan>]] _{<small>([[User talk: Mukkakukaku|blah?]])</small>} 08:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>