Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Perl Programming: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:53, 30 June 2011

Latest revision as of 16:45, 2 February 2022

(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''no consensus'''. [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] ^{''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''} 02:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

===[[Advanced Perl Programming]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}

:{{la|Advanced Perl Programming}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Perl Programming|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 June 19#{{anchorencode:Advanced Perl Programming}}|View log]]</noinclude>)

Line 40 ⟶ 46:

<hr style="width:55%;" />

:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />

:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<span style="color:#7d7d7d">m.o.p</span>]] 04:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]

<hr style="width:55%;" />

:'''Delete''' per [[User:Rogerd]]. A couple of positive book reviews do not confer notability. [[User:TallNapoleon|TallNapoleon]] ([[User talk:TallNapoleon|talk]]) 06:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Line 47 ⟶ 53:

:: Gimme a break, that's an ad in another book by the same company, not a review. [[User:FuFoFuEd|FuFoFuEd]] ([[User talk:FuFoFuEd|talk]]) 05:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

:::* Ok, here's a review in ''[http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/2523 Linux Journal]''. Q.E.D. [[User:Colonel Warden|Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 06:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

* '''delete''' per nom, '' 'an average programming book' ''. We've recently seen either the Camel or Llama books (maybe both) at AfD and either of those had a really significant impact on Perl and the Perl community. This one didn't. It's a good book, but there's just not much to say about it - which is reflected in an article here that says less than a typical Amazon review would. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 18:30, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>