Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learning Perl: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m fixing signature |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[Learning Perl]]===▼
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''Speedy keep''' — nomination withdrawn by nominator, no other opinions to delete (non-admin closure). [[User:Chaos5023|—chaos5023]] ([[User talk:Chaos5023|talk]]) 14:48, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
▲===[[Learning Perl]]===
:{{la|Learning Perl}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learning Perl|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 June 19#{{anchorencode:Learning Perl}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
:({{Find sources|Learning Perl}})
Line 34 ⟶ 39:
*'''Weak keep'''. The book is well-known and has a somewhat legendary status in the Perl community. I think that if we have articles about all kinds of programming languages, even exotic and little-used ones, we should have articles about some of the most notable books too, because they can be very influential. This, in connection with Ruud's argument (the book cited in 47 other books), makes this notable enough for our purposes. I understand the nominators concerns, and I think perhaps a community discussion should be initiated about notability of programming books. [[User:Nanobear|Nanobear]] ([[User talk:Nanobear|talk]]) 13:17, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||