Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aikido (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:36, 15 February 2011

Latest revision as of 04:28, 6 February 2022

(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. &nbsp; -- '''''[[User:Lear's Fool|Lear's]] [[User Talk:Lear's Fool|Fool]]''''' 02:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

===[[Aikido (programming language)]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}

:{{la|Aikido (programming language)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aikido (programming language)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 February 12#{{anchorencode:Aikido (programming language)}}|View log]]</noinclude>)

Line 8 ⟶ 14:

*'''Keep''' Looks like a good contribution to programming language theory and history. No arguments were given why the language is obscure. --[[User:Sergey shandar|Sergey Shandar]] ([[User talk:Sergey shandar|talk]]) 06:31, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

* '''Woefully uninformed comment''' - There is zero evidence in the article that this satisfies the [[WP:N|general notability]] guideline. And @Sergey Shandar, the burden of proof is on <u>the person who claims</u> it's notable, not the other way around. - [[User:Aaron Brenneman|Aaron Brenneman]] ([[User talk:Aaron Brenneman|talk]]) 12:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

::I suggest people use the word "burden" carefully in discussing notability policy, as it tends to confound the discussion with [[WP:BURDEN]] content policy.&nbsp; What also helps is to identify relevant notability policy.&nbsp; [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 17:47, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

<hr style="width:55%;" />

:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 01:23, 12 February 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]

* '''Delete.''' Doesn't past the [[WP:GNG|GNG]] reliable secondary source requirements. All I can find on the internet are the language's webpage, development site (Sourceforge), and a bunch of download sites. --[[User:Mukkakukaku|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006600;">[[User:Mukkakukaku|'''M'''û'''ĸĸ'''â'''ĸ'''û'''ĸ'''â'''ĸ'''û]]</fontspan>]] _{<small>([[User talk: Mukkakukaku|blah?]])</small>} 09:36, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''&nbsp; I don't know why this professionally-written object-oriented interpreter with five patents does not draw more attention, but I could not find independent secondary sources to establish notability.&nbsp; I added one reference from sourceforge, which at least the material is not a wiki mirror.&nbsp; [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 17:47, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>