Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrative, Library and Computing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 11:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
===[[Administrative, Library and Computing]]===
:{{la|Administrative, Library and Computing}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Administrative, Library and Computing|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrative, Library and Computing]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrative, Library and Computing|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 June 29#{{anchorencode:Administrative, Library and Computing}}|View log]])</noinclude>
Unreferenced after a number of years, the article gives extremely too much detail, with no context. The title doesnt make sense compared to the article, and is an absolutely horrible title (no one could conceivably be looking for this subject matter under this title, and no one would guess that this title is referring to this content). the article reads like a page from an administative history of a school district, but gives no reason for why this is notable. if someone could have fixed this, it would have been done already. [[User:Mercurywoodrose|Mercurywoodrose]] ([[User talk:Mercurywoodrose|talk]]) 07:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not]] a guide to British University staff pay grades, and this is unsourced and likely to go out-of-date with the next administrative upheaval. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 14:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. --[[User:Metropolitan90|Metropolitan90]] [[User talk:Metropolitan90|(talk)]] 07:38, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 14:51, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||