Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simplified swarm optimization: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:27, 2 August 2011

Latest revision as of 13:08, 8 February 2022

(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)

Line 10:

:{{la|Simplified swarm optimization}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simplified swarm optimization|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 July 25#{{anchorencode:Simplified swarm optimization}}|View log]]</noinclude>)

:({{Find sources|Simplified swarm optimization}})

I was tempted to tag this for speedy as "no context" but I believe it is something in computer science. No attempt made to demonstrate notability. &mdash; [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]]&nbsp;{{toolbar|separator=dot|[[::User talk:RHaworth|talk]] | [[::Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]] }} 10:16, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

*'''Merge''' to [[Swarm_intelligence]] until it matures enough to stand on it's own like [[Particle_swarm_optimization]] --[[User:DeVerm|DeVerm]] ([[User talk:DeVerm|talk]]) 15:36, 18 July 2011 (UTC).

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 20:34, 18 July 2011 (UTC)</small>

Line 42:

:Now the algorithm may well be an improvement to the PSO or it may not. I'm not qualified to judge. Indeed we only have the authors word that it is better as the technical report has not been peer reviewed which would offers at least a basic check. Further as there are no citations no one else in the academic community has looked at the algorithm. So we are suggesting adding an untested algorithm to PSO article. Potentially this could have serious consequences as we essentially give our recommendation to the algorithm and if it were to turn out to have a serious bug some third party could be badly affected. --[[User:Salix alba|Salix]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]): 13:02, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

:: The thing is, besides not having any outside references, there isn't enough new information about this to warrant putting it on the PSO page. The only thing new about it is the method to choose the position. DPSOs in general are more notable and those aren't mentioned either. [[User:Snaphat|snaphat]] ([[User talk:Snaphat|talk]]) 14:05, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>