Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleet Systems Engineering Team: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Fleet Systems Engineering Team: delete |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|<span style="color:red;">♥</span>]] [[User talk:King of Hearts|<span style="color:red;">♦</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/King of Hearts|<span style="color:black;">♣</span>]] ♠ 05:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
===[[Fleet Systems Engineering Team]]===
:{{la|Fleet Systems Engineering Team}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Fleet Systems Engineering Team|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleet Systems Engineering Team]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleet Systems Engineering Team|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 June 21#{{anchorencode:Fleet Systems Engineering Team}}|View log]])</noinclude>
Line 6 ⟶ 13:
*'''Delete'''. An article on an unremarkable training scheme in the US Navy. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 21:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
:* It's not a training scheme. [[User:Colonel Warden|Colonel Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 22:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
::*An article about the ''products'' of a training scheme if you prefer. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuorum|talk]]) 22:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. I have added two citations to demonstrate notability. [[User:Colonel Warden|Colonel Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 22:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Military|list of Military-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Nick Dowling|Nick Dowling]] ([[User talk:Nick Dowling|talk]]) 01:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete'''. Not notable. [[User:Buckshot06|Buckshot06]]([[User:Kirill Lokshin/Professionalism|prof]]) 02:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Sources included aren't really independent. Spawar helps design new systems for the navy and works closely w/ L-3. The house committee source is from the testimony of the spawar commander. I see that the user was in the navy (he was on a target, to boot) and now works for L-3, so he clearly has some interest and expertise. My suggestion is that he search out independent sources for the information provided. ''The Naval Engineer's Journal'' is a highly technical third party resource that may have an article on FSET installations. ''Seapower'', published by the Navy League is also sufficiently independent, so a promo story on FC's might work. ''All Hands'' is not technically independent, but is probably sufficiently so for an article like this. [[User:Protonk|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk|talk]]) 02:29, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' non notable training scheme or organisation, article does not make much sense in either case. [[User:Doktorbuk|doktorb]] <sub>[[User talk:Doktorbuk|words]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Doktorbuk|deeds]]</sup> 18:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
:* Meh. The article looks like it was written by a chief. It makes sense presuming that you understand the terms and admire some of the syntactical peculiarities of modern naval language. The article subject probably isn't notable, but there is a slim possibility that a concerted search through periodicals dedicated to the subject might reform that outlook. [[User:Protonk|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk|talk]]) 20:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||