Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphics Layout Engine: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:06, 20 December 2011

Latest revision as of 06:49, 11 February 2022

(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''keep'''. –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 23:26, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

===[[Graphics Layout Engine]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}

:{{la|Graphics Layout Engine}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphics Layout Engine|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 December 14#{{anchorencode:Graphics Layout Engine}}|View log]]</noinclude>)

Line 24 ⟶ 30:

**And the three references above - The first one is a blog. The second one is a blog. The third one allows news submissions from anyone. Really? [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 15:08, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' - Changing vote. Czarkoff refs establish notability. My reading of [[WP:USERG]] does not disqualify them. People out there clearly think this is a useful utility. --[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 01:06, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

*:[[WP:SPS]] says "self-published media ... are largely not acceptable" and offers only two exceptions: (1) published experts and (2) sources writing about themselves. How does [[WP:USERG]] not disqualify all three of the sources Czarkoff posted? – [[User:Pnm|Pnm]] ([[User talk:Pnm|talk]]) 01:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

*::I do not read the list of [[WP:USERG]] exceptions as exhaustive. The refs are a bit better than a blog or a forum. My personal criteria for [[WP:RS]] establishing notability is more permissive than for citations. --[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 03:57, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' - GLE definitely worth an entry in Wikipedia. It's an active open-source software useful for documents producing. May be the actual entry should be completed with some examples of scripts and output results? --[[Special:Contributions/84.100.6.215|84.100.6.215]] ([[User talk:84.100.6.215|talk]]) 08:33, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>