Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morphological computation (robotics): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Replaced obsolete font tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 14:
*'''Comment''' <s>'''Speedy close''' and invite {{user|Kakila}} to have another go at nominating it. --[[User:Northernhenge|Northernhenge]] ([[User talk:Northernhenge|talk]]) 00:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)</s> Fixed already [[User:Northernhenge|Northernhenge]] ([[User talk:Northernhenge|talk]]) 00:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' I read the whole article carefully. Despite being technical sounding, it is a lot of vague hype and nothingness. It does nothing to either detail or explain the supposed topic. The references are very limited, the most prevalent author is the very person being promoted in the article. The newest reference is 5 years old. <
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:NOR]]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 21:10, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||