Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piet programming language: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:24, 3 October 2006

Latest revision as of 09:21, 13 February 2022

(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''Keep'''. [[User:Deathphoenix|Deathphoenix]] [[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''ʕ''']] 15:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

===[[Piet (programming language)|Piet programming language]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}

This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_September_7&diff=prev&oldid=75309566 here]. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I '''abstain'''. [[User:Xoloz|Xoloz]] 14:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Amusing idea, but not really illustrative of anything in particular. Perhaps treat briefly in [[Funge]] as a variant on the notion. [[User:flowersofnight|flowersofnight]] [[User talk:flowersofnight|(talk)]] 17:33, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Line 10 ⟶ 17:

*<s>'''Keep'''</s> How can you do this to me? [[User:Pietdesomere|Piet]] | [[User talk:Pietdesomere|Talk]] 07:18, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

:*Withdraw my vote ;-) I shouldn't positively discriminate because of the thing's name. [[User:Pietdesomere|Piet]] | [[User talk:Pietdesomere|Talk]] 07:18, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Keep.''' Quit it. Just because you can't code Piet, doesn't mean you should delete it, Xoloz. --{{User:Thematrixeatsyou/Save The Essies|culprit=Xoloz|lang=Pietsig}} 09:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' I've given up !voting on these esolang nominations for now, apart from the ones worth keeping. Piet is verifiable, moderately unusual, and seems [http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=Piet+%22programming+language%22&meta= more notable than the average esolang, according to Google]. --[[User:ais523|ais523]] 14:20, 2 October 2006 ([[User:ais523|U]][[User talk:ais523|T]][[Special:Contributions/Ais523|C]])

** Most "Piet"s refer to Dutch individuals called Piet, not the programming langauge. Could you point out the secondary sources which make this language verifiable? —''[[User:R._Koot|Ruud]]'' 23:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

***I'm not sure how much credence you give to the two in the article... I would consider implementations (which seem to be based on the original dangermouse page) as secondary sources, in which case you've got at least [http://www.gaertner.de/~schoenfr/npiet/] and [http://search.cpan.org/src/MAJCHER/Piet-Interpreter-0.03/bin/piet] (different authors, different websites, different languages; this was just from the first 2 pages of Google results, which are mostly true positives; the proportion of correct results drops off about the 7th page). I haven't mentioned the (non-Wikipedia) wiki and blog coverage here (which gives notability but not verifiability per [[WP:RS]]). --[[User:ais523|ais523]] 09:24, 3 October 2006 ([[User:ais523|U]][[User talk:ais523|T]][[Special:Contributions/Ais523|C]])

*'''Keep''' for the reasons stated above [[User:Swalot|Swalot]] 20:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

*'''Keep!''' Esoteric programming languages are part of the informatics culture and should be mentioned. [[User:LHOON|LHOON]] 13:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>