Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Programmer's day: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me|Can't sleep, clown will eat me]] 01:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
===[[Programmer's day]]===
:''[[Programmer's Day]] was nominated for deletion on [[2004-09-12]]. The result of the discussion was "delete". For the prior discussion, see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Programmer's Day]].''
Imaginary/joke holiday. Ridiculously few Google hits given its subject area, and no sources cited. [[User:Dtcdthingy|Dtcdthingy]] 08:00, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
*Why not make it an actual Holiday, and give credit to Wikipedia for initiating this Holiday. BTW, I am really not joking
**Because Wikipedia is not the place to promote new ideas. We're an encyclopedia and we only write on things that already exist. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 09:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nominator. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 09:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Line 15 ⟶ 21:
***However, no [[WP:V|verifiable]] evidence has been produced that this is widespread. [[User:Fan-1967|Fan-1967]] 14:55, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Real programmers don't take holidays. [[User:Sjc|Sjc]] 12:15, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
*Not sure what kind of references would be satisfying but the holiday was [http://www.pcworld.pl/news/99332.html mentioned] in [http://www.pcworld.pl/ PC World Komputer] - a Polish edition of a [[PC World (magazine)|PC World]] magazine (read by about half a million people) which sort of proves that the concept was not made up recently by a random guy who only wanted to edit Wikipedia.
**Yeah, but it's not about whether the ''idea'' exists. Neither that link nor the one that's been added acknowledge it as anything more than a semi-joke proposed holiday. Semi-joke proposed holidays that barely exist don't belong in Wikipedia. --[[User:Dtcdthingy|Dtcdthingy]] 14:37, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
***I don't see why. [[System Administrator Appreciation Day|SAAD]] is a semi-joke as are most of the things related to geek culture. I agree that calling it ''holiday'' is a bit too much, but a little of reediting the article should solve the problem. -- mina86, [[User:217.96.228.130|217.96.228.130]] 19:14, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Line 24 ⟶ 30:
******Please don't create straw men, or use the fallacious "If article X then article Y." argument. The article that you cite reports that 1 person is campaining to have this day made an official holiday. Where are all of the ''other'' people documenting this purported holiday? [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] 00:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
*******All I'm saying is that I don't understand what's the big difference between Programmers' Day and the other days which make the former nominated for deletion. The article I cite also reports that "''Many programmers considered this day ''[256th day of the year]'' the informal professional holiday.''" And finally, the ''other'' people documenting this holiday are the editors of PC World. -- mina86, [[User:217.96.228.130|217.96.228.130]] 13:57, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''DON't Delete''' Knowing of this day made me really proud. Perhaps i would pick another day, so we could also celebrate on someone. Please keep these article so we can spread it. Thanks.
*'''Delete''' Non-notable, unverifiable. Looks a lot more like something [[WP:NFT|made up in school]] than anything ever taken seriously by professional programmers. [[User:Fan-1967|Fan-1967]] 14:55, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
* '''KEEP''' Moscow Times has a 2002 article, which gives the subject some credibility. Larisa Naumenko. [http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2002/10/23/052.html "Programmers Want Their Own Holiday"], The Moscow Times, 2002-10-23, pp. 9. -- I fail to see the value in speedy deletion of this, as the only purpose that serves is taking away people's opportunities to actually do the research and find references. It should also be noted that content veryfing the existence of the holiday has been deleted from the article, see the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Programmer%27s_day&oldid=75542921 17:48, 13 September 2006] edit
**That edit removed a link to some nobody's blog. In no way is a blog considered a [[WP:RS|source]] for [[WP:V|verifying]] anything. [[User:Fan-1967|Fan-1967]] 16:55, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''DON't Delete''' Redefine this article as a reference to a proposal instead of a real holiday so this way it can be spread. The idea does exist so it must be documented as what it is, an idea.Thanks
* Don't Delete! The idea of this article is good. There must be a reference for programmers holiday on WiKi!
** Please [[Wikipedia:cite sources|show that there are references ''off'' Wikipedia]]. This is Wikipedia, by the way. [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] 01:32, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per all the "DON't Delete" votes which are making a good case to delete it on their own. [[User:Danny Lilithborne|Danny Lilithborne]] 18:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Line 50 ⟶ 56:
*'''Keep''' per significant PC World mention; PC World is definitely a reliable source, making this notable. Saying that something should be deleted just because new users want it kept is a silly reason to delete something, and I presume that the closing admin will disregard those opinions. Also, the nominator said that there were "ridiculously few" google hits, without giving a link. Upon further investigation, there are actually [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22Programmer%27s+Day%22+-Wikipedia+&btnG=Search 15,000]. Not quite ridiculously few. --[[User talk:Rory096|Rory096]] 04:16, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
**Just a few days ago, there were barely any hits at all. It's gotten many mentions in the last few days only because a few popular blogs have linked to the Wikipedia article. I suppose we could rewrite the article to state the "Programmer's Day is a fictitious holiday invented in a Wikipedia article that was mentioned in many blogs in 2006", but covering such temporary internet fads doesn't make sense. Let's recreate the page if people still "celebrate" the holiday three years from now. [[User:Fredrik|Fredrik Johansson]] 12:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
*** This 'holiday' is definitely older than from this year. I remember greeting cards for this occasion available on yahoo some 5 years ago. Yes, that's not a reliable source, and I have better things to do than looking for one. At least your 'made-up' above was too quick a shot - at least it wasn't made up on wikipedia. I already gave my opinion/vote as "tim", so... [[User:Bullhaddha|Bullhaddha]] 20:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
***To the contrary, there were absolutely no mentions to Wikipedia in any of those pages. Note the "-wikipedia" in the search term. --[[User talk:Rory096|Rory096]] 16:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
* What about days like that: the [[Talk_Like_a_Pirate_Day]]. As I understand, we only need somebody claiming having invented Programmer's Day, and it'll be valid. I already said I heard about it from somebody else, so.. who wants? [[User:Bullhaddha|Bullhaddha]] 20:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||