Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simple Declarative Language: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Simple Declarative Language: Delete, no secondary sources found
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
 
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
 
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Scottywong|<span style="font:small-caps 1.2em Garamond,Times,serif;color:#444444;letter-spacing:0.2em;">‑Scottywong</span>]][[User talk:Scottywong|<span style="font:0.75em Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif;color:#444444;">|&nbsp;gossip&nbsp;_</span>]] 17:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
===[[Simple Declarative Language]]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}
 
:{{la|Simple Declarative Language}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simple Declarative Language|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 MarchApril 241#{{anchorencode:Simple Declarative Language}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Simple_Declarative_Language Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources|Simple Declarative Language}})
No evidence of notability through extensive coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources. A Google Scholar search for 'sdl "simple declarative language"' returns about a dozen hits, but most of these seem to be for other languages of the same name, and those that are for this particular SDL merely cite it rather than discuss it in detail. [[User:Psychonaut|Psychonaut]] ([[User talk:Psychonaut|talk]]) 13:10, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Line 11 ⟶ 17:
 
*'''Delete''' I was unable to find any secondary sources for this topic. There are two articles on SDL at TechHui, but these are blogs by an author associated with the company that sponsors this data serialization format. There is a mention at O'Reiily, but this was just a short paragraph and not in depth. There are several language bindings/libraries for the format for Ruby, .Net and Java/Swing, but these are all sponsored by the company that sponsors this data format. That SDL exists and that the format is as the article claims is verifiable in the primary sources, but the topic does not meet notability standards either for general notability [[WP:GNG]] or software notability [[WP:NSOFT]]. SDL is worth a mention at [[Serialization#Serialization formats]], per [[WP:PRESERVE]]. But unless secondary sources are found, the article cannot stand. --[[User:Mark viking|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking|talk]]) 18:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten|talk]]) 00:26, 1 April 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
<hr style="width:55%;" />
 
*'''Delete''' There really is no solid information out there for SDL; the only thing you can find is mostly buzz. I was only able to find a few (3 or 4) books specifically on the subject and not just referenced as part of a known programming language (C++, .NET, etc.). I am with Mark on this one, this does not meet notability standards to remain. --[[User:Karverstudio|Karverstudio]] ([[User talk:Karverstudio|talk]]) 17:13, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
**I'm sorry, did you say you were able to find three or four books specifically on SDL? If so, then it should easily pass our notability requirements. Could you list the books here or in the article? —[[User:Psychonaut|Psychonaut]] ([[User talk:Psychonaut|talk]]) 19:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
** I will happily change my recommendation if there are such sources. We need to be a little careful, however, because SDL is an overloaded acronym. There is a much more popular SDL in the form of [[Simple DirectMedia Layer]] and there are books written on this, e.g., the list at the [http://wiki.libsdl.org/moin.fcg/Books SDL wiki]. But I haven't seen any books for the simple declarative language. --[[User:Mark viking|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking|talk]]) 21:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>