Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rigorous error analysis: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:35, 11 February 2007

Latest revision as of 05:28, 14 February 2022

(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)

Line 9:

===[[Rigorous error analysis]]===

:{{la|Rigorous error analysis}}

:{{la|Rigerous error analysis}} {{abca}}

The article is wrong in that the error analysis presented is not rigorous. It says that the error in f(x) is the derivative f' times the error in x raised to the second power. This is a decent error estimate except that you shouldn't raise the error in x to the second power. However, it is not rigorous; a rigorous error analysis would yield a ''bound'' on the error, not an ''estimate''.

Line 27 ⟶ 28:

*'''Delete''' Not a notable topic. [[Errors and residuals in statistics]] and [[numerical analysis]] address this topic adequately. [[User:DavidCBryant|DavidCBryant]] 21:38, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>