Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullfrog programming language: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:33, 21 September 2006

Latest revision as of 12:29, 14 February 2022

(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Punkmorten|Punkmorten]] 09:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

===[[Bullfrog programming language]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|U}}

This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_September_7&diff=prev&oldid=75309566 here]. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I '''abstain'''. [[User:Xoloz|Xoloz]] 10:33, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' unless, prior to expiration of AfD discussion some good, reliable verifiable sources are cited indicating that this language is of some conceptual importance to computer scientists or hobbyists. Currently, no sources ae cited except the personal web page of its creator, so the article does not meet the [[WP:V|verifiability]] policy. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] [[User_talk:dpbsmith|(talk)]] 23:03, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

*Preferably '''merge and redirect''' to [[List of esoteric programming languages]], alternatively '''delete'''. --[[User:ZeroOne|ZeroOne]] 19:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''ditto [[User:ZeroOne|01]]''' [[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] 07:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' per my rationale at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages]] (maily [[WP:V]]). —''[[User:R._Koot|Ruud]]'' 20:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Non notable. [[User:Equendil|Equendil]] <small>[[User talk:Equendil|''Talk'']]</small> 00:18, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>