Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automated Dynamic Visual Acuity Test: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
deleted |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 7:
The result was '''deleted''', vanity spam, part of a walled garden. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> 11:30, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
===[[Automated Dynamic Visual Acuity Test]]===
promotional [[User:Tom harrison|Tom Harrison]] <sup>[[User talk:Tom harrison|Talk]]</sup> 02:18, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Blatant spam and completely unverifiable. 0 google hits. [[User:Irongargoyle|Irongargoyle]] 03:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' no doubt this is [[WP:SPAM|spam]]. [[User:Mitaphane|Mitaphane]] <sub>[[User talk:Mitaphane|talk]]</sub> 04:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - spam spam spam spam. - [[User:Richardcavell|Richardcavell]] 06:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
|