Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object-oriented design ontology: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:25, 4 August 2014

Latest revision as of 08:07, 15 February 2022

(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. The comments since the relisting make the consensus clear. [[User:Deor|Deor]] ([[User talk:Deor|talk]]) 10:41, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

===[[Object-oriented design ontology]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}

:{{la|Object-oriented design ontology}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object-oriented design ontology|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 August 4#{{anchorencode:Object-oriented design ontology}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Object-oriented_design_ontology Stats]</span>)

:({{Find sources|Object-oriented design ontology}})

This article is pure Original Research. There are no references to the actual topic. There are references to the concept of ontology and references to the fact that object-oriented methods clearly fall into subpart and sublcass hierarchies (as does just about any form of knowledge) but no references (and to my knowledge no such references currently exists, hence OR) to the actual topic. Also, as I documented on Talk page, if we keep this article why shouldn't we have a topic on EVERY possible topic that could be represented via an ontology, which would mean thousands of new topics since just about any form of structured information can be represented by an ontology. [[User:MadScientistX11|MadScientistX11]] ([[User talk:MadScientistX11|talk]]) 17:26, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

:Just want to add that since posting this I did another search. I found a couple of online sources that were relevant but they were a PhD or Masters thesis and a project site at a University computer science department. I do think it's not a bad idea and could see it meriting an article at some point but my interpretation of [[wp:notable|notable]] is that if the idea is at the thesis or school project level it's not yet article worthy. --[[User:MadScientistX11|MadScientistX11]] ([[User talk:MadScientistX11|talk]]) 01:49, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 13:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)</small>

'''Delete'''&mdash;Concur with nom. Object-oriented design is ontologizable, but the ontolization itself has not been treated as a subject in [[WP:RS]]. [[User:Lesser Cartographies|Lesser Cartographies]] ([[User talk:Lesser Cartographies|talk]]) 18:58, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

<hr style="width:55%;" />

:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />

:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]^{[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]} 00:25, 4 August 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]

<hr style="width:55%;" />

* '''Delete''' - 3 reference links are dead. 1 reference is very short, does not reference ontology and is a non-authoritative blog. 1 reference discusses object oriented design, but not ontology. 1 suggests that the practice of ontology arises from object oriented design but does not suggest that a specific OOD ontology exists. The last reference, A Theory of Object-Oriented Design, purports to "define an ontology that serves as a frame of reference for the discussion in the essential concepts of O-O design." However, it thereafter no longer discusses OOD ontology as a subject. The article may make an excellent proposal for a thesis, but I don't think it is appropriate as a Wikipedia article.--[[User:Rpclod|Rpclod]] ([[User talk:Rpclod|talk]]) 01:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' I too think the subject is insufficiently specifically notable, following the arguments just above.'''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 04:56, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' Original research. No evidence of notability. ~[[user talk:Kvng|KvnG]] 14:51, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' An article based on phrases like "Possible constructs that may be included" and "the various relations that may exist amongst these constructs" indicates that this article is speculative original research. This is not a discrete, notable topic and this article does not belong in this encyclopedia. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 01:29, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>