Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object-oriented design ontology: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:29, 6 August 2014

Latest revision as of 08:07, 15 February 2022

(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. The comments since the relisting make the consensus clear. [[User:Deor|Deor]] ([[User talk:Deor|talk]]) 10:41, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

===[[Object-oriented design ontology]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}

:{{la|Object-oriented design ontology}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object-oriented design ontology|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 August 4#{{anchorencode:Object-oriented design ontology}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Object-oriented_design_ontology Stats]</span>)

Line 10 ⟶ 16:

<hr style="width:55%;" />

:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />

:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]^{[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]} 00:25, 4 August 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]

<hr style="width:55%;" />

* '''Delete''' - 3 reference links are dead. 1 reference is very short, does not reference ontology and is a non-authoritative blog. 1 reference discusses object oriented design, but not ontology. 1 suggests that the practice of ontology arises from object oriented design but does not suggest that a specific OOD ontology exists. The last reference, A Theory of Object-Oriented Design, purports to "define an ontology that serves as a frame of reference for the discussion in the essential concepts of O-O design." However, it thereafter no longer discusses OOD ontology as a subject. The article may make an excellent proposal for a thesis, but I don't think it is appropriate as a Wikipedia article.--[[User:Rpclod|Rpclod]] ([[User talk:Rpclod|talk]]) 01:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Line 16 ⟶ 22:

*'''Delete''' Original research. No evidence of notability. ~[[user talk:Kvng|KvnG]] 14:51, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' An article based on phrases like "Possible constructs that may be included" and "the various relations that may exist amongst these constructs" indicates that this article is speculative original research. This is not a discrete, notable topic and this article does not belong in this encyclopedia. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 01:29, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>