Wikipedia:Proposed guideline for magic methods: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:29, 26 January 2006

Latest revision as of 11:13, 5 March 2022

(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{proposedhistorical}}

*Marked as historical until TStone sees fit as to draw up the actual proposal, instead of a proposal for the proposal. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><span style="color:#DD0000;">&gt;<span style="color:#FF6600;">R<span style="color:#FF9900;">a<span style="color:#FFCC00;">d<span style="color:#FFEE00;">i</span>a</span>n</span>t</span>&lt;</span></b>]] 15:21, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

'''Note:''' A proper proposal will be posted here very soon. See talk page --[[User:TStone|TStone]] 19:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

'''Note2:''' Is it possible to rename this page, and change "policy" to "guideline"? --[[User:TStone|TStone]] 19:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

*Yes. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><span style="color:#DD0000;">&gt;<span style="color:#FF6600;">R<span style="color:#FF9900;">a<span style="color:#FFCC00;">d<span style="color:#FFEE00;">i</span>a</span>n</span>t</span>&lt;</span></b>]] 15:21, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

'''Note3:''' As quite a lot of people here seem to have the opinion: ''User TStone: Nobody cares about "history" or "origins" for tricks, really. We want to know the details.'', I think I have to start over from scratch, and take those opinions into account. No point having a guideline that are likely to be ignored anyway...tricky. --[[User:TStone|TStone]] 09:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

== Summary ==

Line 26 ⟶ 33:

This sounds like it could be very valuable. Please do so. [[User:Kleg|Kleg]] 17:56, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

: See the [[Wikipedia talk:Proposed policy for magic methods|discussion]] on this page for an example of what I propose. --[[User:TStone|TStone]] 23:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

==No Relevant Legal Basis==

The summary should read:''There are no laws that protect magic secrets, but there are ethical rules guarding the process. The respected publishers of magic technical litterature around the world has formed an industry standard and praxis in how to deal with the ethical questions regarding the publication of magic methods. I suggest that Wikipedia adapt the same standards.'' Any mention of the law should clearly state that no law protects magic secrets. Ambivalence here is threatening.--[[User:Muchosucko|Muchosucko]] 22:29, 26 January 2006 (UTC)