Wikipedia:Proposed guideline for magic methods: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Radiant! (talk | contribs)
{{historical}} - not a true proposal yet
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1:
{{historical}}
 
*Marked as historical until TStone sees fit as to draw up the actual proposal, instead of a proposal for the proposal. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#DD0000;">&gt;<fontspan colorstyle="color:#FF6600;">R<fontspan colorstyle="color:#FF9900;">a<fontspan colorstyle="color:#FFCC00;">d<fontspan colorstyle="color:#FFEE00;">i</fontspan>a</fontspan>n</fontspan>t</fontspan>&lt;</fontspan></b>]] 15:21, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 
'''Note:''' A proper proposal will be posted here very soon. See talk page --[[User:TStone|TStone]] 19:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 
'''Note2:''' Is it possible to rename this page, and change "policy" to "guideline"? --[[User:TStone|TStone]] 19:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
*Yes. [[User_talk:Radiant!|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#DD0000;">&gt;<fontspan colorstyle="color:#FF6600;">R<fontspan colorstyle="color:#FF9900;">a<fontspan colorstyle="color:#FFCC00;">d<fontspan colorstyle="color:#FFEE00;">i</fontspan>a</fontspan>n</fontspan>t</fontspan>&lt;</fontspan></b>]] 15:21, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 
'''Note3:''' As quite a lot of people here seem to have the opinion: ''User TStone: Nobody cares about "history" or "origins" for tricks, really. We want to know the details.'', I think I have to start over from scratch, and take those opinions into account. No point having a guideline that are likely to be ignored anyway...tricky. --[[User:TStone|TStone]] 09:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC)