Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Potion (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:30, 24 December 2015

Latest revision as of 20:03, 9 March 2022

(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 18:

* '''Delete''' if it is discussed in independent reliable sources, it is well hidden. I did not find anything with GoogleScholar. A lot of the hits were typos for "portion", and there were several for "Magic Potion", a ___domain specific meta-Language. I did find papers on GoogleScholar mentioning both Michael Fogus and Reini Urban, but none dealing with Potion. Fails [[WP:GNG]]. It does sound like an interesting language and I recommend Reini Urban's summary [http://perl11.org/potion/ here] (not an independet source). --[[User:Bejnar|Bejnar]] ([[User talk:Bejnar|talk]]) 18:50, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />

<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] _{<font color="maroon">[[User talk:The Bushranger|<span style="color:maroon;">One ping only]]</fontspan>]]} 07:37, 17 December 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Potion (programming language)]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->

*'''Delete'''. No significant coverage. Fails GNG. [[User:Only in death|Only in death does duty end]] ([[User talk:Only in death|talk]]) 12:11, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Dialectric|Dialectric]] ([[User talk:Dialectric|talk]]) 14:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)</small>

*'''Delete'''. Yet another programming language with no obvious significance. The only thing in the article that looks like a reliable source is the Slate piece, but that one doesn't even mention the language. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 21:40, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' as there's at best nothing to suggest a considerably better article here. [[User:SwisterTwister|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">SwisterTwister</fontspan>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">talk</fontspan>]] 06:42, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>