Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VEX Robotics Design System: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 00:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
===[[VEX Robotics Design System]]===
:{{la|VEX Robotics Design System}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VEX Robotics Design System|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 October
:({{Find sources AFD|VEX Robotics Design System}})
This article fails the [[WP:GNG|general notability guideline]]. It has no independent, reliable sources. [[User:Sunfoo|Sunfoo]] ([[User talk:Sunfoo|talk]]) 17:04, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Technology|list of Technology-related deletion discussions]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size:x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 06:49, 1 October 2015 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Events|list of Events-related deletion discussions]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size:x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 06:49, 1 October 2015 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''': This article seems reasonable for overall inclusion. I have quibbles with the text of it (particularly the bit mentioning pricing), but a robotics system targeted at young people that seems to have multiple organizations using its system for competitions involving many hundreds of schools meets any rational definition of notability. The fact that it has come to the notice of NASA and a number of high-level offices of state governments seems to corroborate that. There is no large corpus of scholarly writing on this system, but that's to be expected of a production product. I would definitely keep this, but flag the article for a more objective perspective.--[[Special:Contributions/69.204.153.39|69.204.153.39]] ([[User talk:69.204.153.39|talk]]) 23:50, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
*'''Delete for now''' maybe until a better article can be made as I found some links at Books, News, browser and Highbeam but nothing to suggest better sourcing unless someone else can take care of this. [[User:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">SwisterTwister</span>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]] 05:28, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size:x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 01:28, 9 October 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
*'''Delete''' - fails [[WP:GNG]], the argument by the ip is not based on guidelines. Sources do not reveal in-depth coverage. [[User:onel5969|<b><span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#FFB300;">5969</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]</sup> 23:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||