Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Po$$e: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result of the debate was consensus to delete. [[User:Johnleemk|Johnleemk]] | [[User talk:Johnleemk|Talk]] 16:44, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
===[[Po$$e]]===
A group of guys who hang around and play games and occasionally enter tournaments. And they all go to the same school. Not notable. [[User:DJ Clayworth|DJ Clayworth]] 23:00, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete''' per SDCA7, as they are generally '''unremarkable.'''
*'''Keep''' (I don't know if I have a vote, being the creator.) Well, it's a clan, not a person. We're trying to be remarkable. SK| started with three brothers, so I think that the logic of "since they all go to the same school" doesn't really apply. edit: what is it exactly we have to do before we're considered remarkable enough? Check the [[Four Kings]] clan wiki page if you think we lack content in any way. (Also, did you need to have bolded unremarkable? =P ) -saintboy 23:19, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
Line 21 ⟶ 28:
Well, can I the article in my userpage? I assume so. Also, if it's in my user page, is it alright for me to catagorize it in the categories I'm in now? Thanks in advance. [[User:Saintboy|Saintboy]] 20:35, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
:It's not a recommended use of a user page, but it is marginally about you so I think you can keep it. [[User:Ashibaka|Ashibaka]] ([[User talk:Ashibaka|tock]]) 23:07, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
<s>*'''Userfy''' to [[User:Saintboy]] as suggested. Has admitted its about him. [[User:Zordrac|Zordrac]] 01:11, 2 December 2005 (UTC)</s>
*'''Delete''' as already done. [[User:Zordrac|Zordrac]] 01:12, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>
| |||