Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryptographically secure random number generators: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
close - delete |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
Line 17:
*''Delete''' OR. [[User:Dottoreso|Dottore So]] 00:56, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' or '''redirect'''. This is not only a personal opinion but sufficiently indistinct that it cannot even be tested (to the extent such things can be tested) as it stands. Actually the redirect to the CSPRNG would be best for readers looking for CSRNG should definitely be told that no such thing as a CSRNG actually exists and that the concept the term supposedly refers to is a snark. An important bit of context for the non cryptiacs. [[User:Ww|ww]] 18:46, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <
|