Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PCMan File Manager: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:39, 27 February 2013

Latest revision as of 13:46, 1 April 2022

(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''keep'''. <span style="font-family:Century Gothic;">[[User:J04n|J04n]]([[User talk:J04n|talk page]])</span> 11:03, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

===[[PCMan File Manager]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}

:{{la|PCMan File Manager}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PCMan File Manager|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 20#{{anchorencode:PCMan File Manager}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/PCMan_File_Manager Stats]</span>)

Line 11 ⟶ 17:

* I am not going to argue with you, but a review from a blog called "Unixmen" typically does not warrant automatic entry to an encyclopedia. I will go further and say we should probably not have Wikipedia articles every time the Unixmen blog writes about a product. [[User:AMFMUHFVHF90922|AMFMUHFVHF90922]] ([[User talk:AMFMUHFVHF90922|talk]]) 20:46, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

:: I think that is a fair criticism. In the technology media there are a number of websites that I like to call "journalistic"; they are more than some random person's blog but less than a professional news outfit. I think Unixmen fits into that category of marginally reliable sources, in the form of a blog with a wide readership, but it is obviously a gray area and a somewhat subjective assessment on my part. --[[User:Mark viking|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking|talk]]) 21:06, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

<hr style="width:55%;" />

:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />

:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:AMFMUHFVHF90922|AMFMUHFVHF90922]] ([[User talk:AMFMUHFVHF90922|talk]]) 17:33, 27 February 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->

<hr style="width:55%;" />

*'''Keep''' article needs work but passes GNG. [[User:Tiggerjay|Tiggerjay]] ([[User talk:Tiggerjay|talk]]) 20:41, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>