Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiny programming languages: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Weregerbil (talk | contribs) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(15 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result of the debate was '''delete''', no consensus on redirect, but anyone can create it so I'll leave it up to you guys. :) - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 04:29, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
===[[Tiny programming languages]]===
This article has been a stub for almost a year and nobody has done anything with it. As currently written, it's pretty much of a disaster. <s>Perhaps it should just be redirected to [[Domain-specific programming language]]?</s> -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 13:26, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
:When I first proposed this, I wasn't sure if delete or redirect made more sense. Based on the discussion, I've come to the conclusion that '''Delete''' is the right thing. -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 17:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', there will be someday when a user expands stubs. --[[User:Terence Ong|Ter]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<
*'''Comment''': Is "tiny programming language" an established compsci term? <s>If it's not, I vote delete as [[WP:OR]]/defining a new term.</s> --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 14:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
:*No, it's not an established term. '''Delete''' as neologism. [[User:Fan-1967|Fan1967]] 15:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Line 10 ⟶ 18:
:If it's a neologism, then it seems to me delete would make more sense than a redirect. -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 16:29, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
::I'd guess "small/tiny/little (programming) language" are all the same, none of the terms is any more "official" than the others. IMHO delete as unlikely typo is just as fine, especially given that the title is plural. Or create all redirects: small/tiny/little/wee = 4, with "programming" or not = 2, plural or singular = 2, total = 16 variants :-) [[User:Weregerbil|Weregerbil]] 16:37, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
:::Let's not forget ''small language (computer science)'', plus all the combinatorial varients on that :-) -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 16:49, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
::::I'm fine with deleting; I voted redirect because a) redirects take up minimal resources, and b) this is a plausible phrase, so a redirect would aid searches. --[[User:Muchness|Muchness]] 22:47, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as worthless. This has looked virtually the same since July 5 of last year. There is absolutely no indication that anyone will take an interest in it and expand it. The original author probably thought this was a good article as it is. Just get rid of it. [[User:Brian G. Crawford|Brian G. Crawford]] 17:07, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Note''' There's a semi-related discussion going on at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Domain-specific_programming_language#General-purpose_programming_language_merger] -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 21:47, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Term doesn't exist. —''[[User:R._Koot|Ruud]]'' 22:20, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' [[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:#000000;">'''''ε'''''</span>]][[User:Encyclopedist|<span style="color:#000000;">'''γκυκλοπ'''</span>]][[User_talk:Encyclopedist|<span style="color:#808080;">'''αίδεια'''</span>]][[Wikipedia|<span style="color:#808080;">'''*'''</span>]] 22:58, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Do not redirect. Would anybody want to redirect [[Tiny dogs]], [[Tiny mathematical formula]] or [[Tiny atoms]]? [[User:EricR|EricR]] 17:11, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' per nomination. --[[User:Allan McInnes|Allan McInnes]] <small>([[User talk:Allan McInnes|talk]])</small> 18:30, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' per nom. [[User:GRuban|GRuban]] 18:44, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. --[[User:MaNeMeBasat|MaNeMeBasat]] 15:52, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>
|