Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cisco Network Analysis Module: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Replaced obsolete font tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 22:
<hr style="width:50%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:JForget|<span style="color:orange;">'''JForget''' </span>]] 22:52, 31 October 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—<
*'''Delete'''. Not only is this advertising, but it makes no attempt to show historical or technical importance, and this software with "6000 customers" is only going to be of interest to a small number of people. Yes, there are [[WP:OTHERSTUFF|many other software articles]] that ought to be deleted as well. In the fullness of time, we may get around to them. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] ([[User talk:Ihcoyc|talk]]) 20:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Line 34:
*'''Delete''' I cant find independent significant coverage of this [[User:Power.corrupts|Power.corrupts]] ([[User talk:Power.corrupts|talk]]) 10:02, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||