Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ResearchEditor: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:43, 8 January 2009

Latest revision as of 14:18, 4 April 2022

(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 1:

<!-- BEGIN ARCHIVE TEMPLATE --><noinclude>

===[[Requests for checkuser/Case/ResearchEditor|ResearchEditor]]===

<!--

If you are adding a new request for this user please add it above this notice at the top of the page. Only the latest request will appear on the checkuser page. Please don't create a separate page with a different name.

-->

For sockpuppet investigations after January, 2009, see [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ResearchEditor/Archive]]

<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">

<div style="text-align:center;">''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Request for checkuser]]. <fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it'''</fontspan>.''</centerdiv>

<!-- END ARCHIVE TEMPLATE -->

===[[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ResearchEditor|ResearchEditor]]===

{{rfcu box|case=ResearchEditor|filed=18:42, 8 January 2009 (UTC)|clerknote=note}}

* {{checkuser|Brewopco}} to [[physical abuse]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Physical_abuse&diff=247490019&oldid=246783127 diff]

Line 13 ⟶ 22:

That seems to be the lot. Possible ResearchEditor sockpuppets. All added the exact same information and citations to multiple pages using a series of throwaway accounts. The POV and sources suggest RE, promoting the discredited idea that there's any weight to the [[satanic ritual abuse]] moral panic, the use of the [[extreme abuse surveys]] (G4 speedied as a recreation of the [[Extreme Abuse Survey]] with an AFD [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme Abuse Survey|here]]) and Randy Noblitt's discredited beliefs about satanic ritual abuse. All are [[WP:SPA|single-purpose accounts]] that have only one topic's worth of edits, and redlinked talk and user pages. If it's not RE, then I would be very surprised, and even if not I can't concieve that it's not someone else sockpuppeting. If not RFCU-ed, accounts should probably be blocked anyway for [[WP:SPAM|spamming]]. [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|^{<span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span>}]]/[[WP:POL|_{<span style='color:#008080'>complex</span>}]] 18:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

:The following are {{likely}} as ResearchEditor:

#{{vandal|Brewopco}}

#{{vandal|Turtleshell2go}}

#{{vandal|Raspla42}}

#{{vandal|Toswi82}}

#{{vandal|Reccaban2}}

#{{vandal|Nmpras}}

#{{vandal|Burgelt}}

#{{vandal|Tn25dog}}

The following are {{possible}}:

#{{vandal|Msbvben}}

#{{vandal|Donrus22}}

There's hardly any overlap between these accounts, but they all appear to be editing in the same general area. <span style="background:white;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] </span>_{([[User talk:Nishkid64|Make articles, not wikidrama]])} 21:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

{{clerknote}} All accounts marked {{tl|likely}} have been indef blocked and tagged. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 21:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

<!-- BEGIN ARCHIVE TEMPLATE --><noinclude>

:Msbvben and Donrus22 demonstrate knowledge of intricate ref formatting from their first edits. These two articles seem to fit in ResearchEditor's topics of interest, so I think a block can be made based on behavior. I haven't looked over the ArbCom decision involving ResearchEditor in its entirety, but does an indefinite block seem appropriate in light of the new sockpuppetry? <span style="background:white;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] </span>_{([[User talk:Nishkid64|Make articles, not wikidrama]])} 21:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

<!--

::I am currently reading over the ArbCom case, and will make that decision here shortly. Also, consider the other two accounts blocked. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 21:55, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

If you are adding a new request for this user please add it above this notice at the top of the page. Only the latest request will appear on the checkuser page. Please don't create a separate page with a different name.

-->

{{clerknote}} {{User|ResearchEditor}} has been indef blocked, and ArbCom has been notified. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 22:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

{| class="messagebox"

| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add </br><span style="font-size: 125%">'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>{{FULLPAGENAME}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''</span></br> to the checkuser page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser&action=edit&section=1 here]. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Requests for checkuser]] (but will still appear here).

|}

<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">

<center>''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Request for checkuser]]. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it'''</font>.</center>

<!-- END ARCHIVE TEMPLATE -->

=== [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ResearchEditor|ResearchEditor]] ===

Line 46 ⟶ 63:

::IP {{unrelated}}. {{Confirmed}} that {{user|Attafire}} = {{user|Previewriver}} = {{user|Raorino}}. Highly {{likely}} that they are all {{user|ResearchEditor}} – same home ISP in same town. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] </span>_{([[User talk:Nishkid64|Make articles, not wikidrama]])} 00:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

*{{clerknote}} Confirmed accounts blocked. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 01:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</fontspan></br />Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.''</centerdiv></div>

</br>

</noinclude>