Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ResearchEditor: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→ResearchEditor: comment. |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<!-- BEGIN ARCHIVE TEMPLATE --><noinclude>▼
<!-- ▼
If you are adding a new request for this user please add it above this notice at the top of the page. Only the latest request will appear on the checkuser page. Please don't create a separate page with a different name.▼
-->▼
For sockpuppet investigations after January, 2009, see [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ResearchEditor/Archive]]
<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">▼
<div style="text-align:center;">''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Request for checkuser]]. <
<!-- END ARCHIVE TEMPLATE -->▼
===[[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ResearchEditor|ResearchEditor]]===
{{rfcu box|case=ResearchEditor|filed=18:42, 8 January 2009 (UTC)|clerknote=note}}
Line 30 ⟶ 39:
{{clerknote}} All accounts marked {{tl|likely}} have been indef blocked and tagged. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 21:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
:Msbvben and Donrus22 demonstrate knowledge of intricate ref formatting from their first edits. These two articles seem to fit in ResearchEditor's topics of interest, so I think a block can be made based on behavior. I haven't looked over the ArbCom decision involving ResearchEditor in its entirety, but does an indefinite block seem appropriate in light of the new sockpuppetry? <span style="background:white;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] </span><sub>([[User talk:Nishkid64|Make articles, not wikidrama]])</sub> 21:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
::I am currently reading over the ArbCom case, and will make that decision here shortly. Also, consider the other two accounts blocked. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 21:55, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
{{clerknote}} {{User|ResearchEditor}} has been indef blocked, and ArbCom has been notified. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 22:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
▲<!-- BEGIN ARCHIVE TEMPLATE --><noinclude>
▲<!--
▲If you are adding a new request for this user please add it above this notice at the top of the page. Only the latest request will appear on the checkuser page. Please don't create a separate page with a different name.
▲-->
▲<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">
▲<center>''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Request for checkuser]]. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it'''</font>.</center>
▲<!-- END ARCHIVE TEMPLATE -->
=== [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ResearchEditor|ResearchEditor]] ===
Line 62 ⟶ 63:
::IP {{unrelated}}. {{Confirmed}} that {{user|Attafire}} = {{user|Previewriver}} = {{user|Raorino}}. Highly {{likely}} that they are all {{user|ResearchEditor}} – same home ISP in same town. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] </span><sub>([[User talk:Nishkid64|Make articles, not wikidrama]])</sub> 00:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
*{{clerknote}} Confirmed accounts blocked. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 01:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <
</br>
</noinclude>
|