Wikipedia:Featured article review/Java (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:52, 9 July 2006

Latest revision as of 16:57, 4 April 2022

(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 1:

===[[Java programming language]]===

:''Article is [[Wikipedia:Former featured articles|no longer a featured article]].''

====Review commentary====

Not enough citations. [[User:Ideogram|Ideogram]] 08:21, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

: There are two many external links too, which should maybe be put in a separate article. -- [[User:Grafikm_fr|<fontspan colorstyle="Bluecolor:blue;">'''Grafikm'''</fontspan>]] ^{[[User talk:Grafikm_fr|'''<fontsup colorstyle="color:red;">(AutoGRAF)</fontsup>''']]} 08:50, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

*Criterion 2a is not met. Examples:

Line 19 ⟶ 20:

====FARC commentary====

:''Main FA criteria concerns are citations (2c) and quality of writing (2b2a).'' [[User:Marskell|Marskell]] 16:47, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

::Talk messages left at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer science]], [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Programming languages]], and [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing]]. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] 22:51, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

*'''Remove''' three weeks, negligible edits, no change in citations and prose, no indication anyone is working on it. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] 03:33, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

*'''Remove'''. Someone's had a poke around it, but none of the substantial problems has been addressed in all of this time. I notice a prominent "The above example merits a bit of explanation." [[User:Tony1|Tony]] 02:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

*'''Remove'''. This fails the criteria in 3 especially. I don't believe an article with large bullet point sections is in keeping with the style manual and the bullets are deployed even where not necessary (such as the criticism section). Shortish LEAD, lack of citations, and something of a link farm at the end. [[User:Marskell|Marskell]] 12:51, 25 July 2006 (UTC)