Content deleted Content added
m →Evaluation: fixed "; added links to WP articles; punctuation; fixed format; edits for flow |
m link categorical data using Find link |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{
'''Form and Document Creation''' is one of the things that [[Technical communication|technical communicators]] do as part of creating [[deliverable]]s for their companies or clients. Document design is:
▲'''Form and Document Creation''' is one of the things that [[Technical communication|technical communicators]] do as part of creating [[deliverable]]s for their companies or clients. Document design is: “the field of theory and practice aimed at creating comprehensible, persuasive and usable functional documents”.<ref>Jansen</ref> These forms and documents can have many different purposes such as collecting or providing information.
==Visualization and Visual Communication==
Line 11 ⟶ 10:
===Definition===
Technical communicators must take data and convert it into information; this process is known as [[Information Visualization|visualization]], or [[visual communication]].<ref name=blythe347>Blythe, 347.</ref> Because of the widespread use of [[digital media]], modern technical communicators must also now think about visualization as it relates to digital forms and documents. Stuart K. Card, Jock D. Mackinlay, and Ben Shneiderman, editors of the book ''Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think'', define visualization as the: "use of computer-supported, interactive, visual representations of data to amplify cognition".<ref name=blythe347/> Though many forms and documents will still have a paper copy for distribution, most forms and documents are now utilized online in some fashion; this is why there is such focus on the computer-supported representations for maximal cognition. Brumberger defines visual communication as: "designing print, Web, and multimedia documents…creating visual displays of information/data, generating other visual material…and any other communication tasks which rely on visual
===Examples===
There are many areas where professional writers utilize visualization. It is most useful in the following areas: complex documents, statistical and [[categorical variable|categorical data]], personal services, and histories.<ref>Blythe, 348.</ref>
Visual communication responsibilities include: designing visual content, determining when to use visual material, modifying existing material, and applying templates that already exist to material.<ref name=brumberger387>Brumberger, 387.</ref>
Line 83 ⟶ 82:
====Flush====
When typing a document, the technical communicator should make the text flush left because: "it’s the easiest to read because we read it most often".<ref>
====Capital Letters====
Capital letters should not be used to accentuate words on a form or document; it is too distracting and disrupts the look of the form or document.<ref name=erik1>
====Bullets====
Some technical communicators use hyphens for listed items; however, a writer should use bullets or centered points instead.<ref>
===Standard Expository Model===
Line 99 ⟶ 98:
Standard expository models are: "nonfiction print documents that (1) are primarily informational rather than expressive; (2) are intended to be read linearly (broadly speaking, from beginning to end); and (3) reveal structure explicitly with at least one heading level but very often more."<ref>Farkas, 12.</ref>
If a form being created fits within the SE model, there are three main strategies to be employed when creating it.
:#The first is to tuck introductions and conclusions.<ref>Farkas, 13.</ref> This means that there is no separate heading for the introduction and conclusion; instead, the introduction and conclusion aspects of the writing are within the first and last main points.<ref>Farkas, 13-14.</ref>
Line 107 ⟶ 106:
===Language and Word Choice===
Gillian Harvey, a partner and senior designer at Plumbheavy Design Inc., a company that does graphic design and information design, has several recommendations for technical communicators regarding language and word choice.<ref>Harvey, 24.</ref>
:#The first is to use vocabulary that the reader will easily understand; this is vital when creating a form or document with instructions the reader is expected to follow.<ref>Harvey, 21.</ref>
:#Harvey also recommends the use of [[personal pronouns]], especially
:#Finally, Harvey instructs technical communicators to use [[active voice|active phrases]] rather than [[passive voice|passive phrases]] because they are easier for a reader to comprehend.<ref name=harvey22/>
Line 137 ⟶ 136:
As in every stage of form and document design, technical communicators must be constantly aware of the impressions of design decision on the reader. Pamela W. Henderson, Joan L. Giese, and Joseph A. Cote, faculty in the Department of Marketing at Washington State University, point out that: "it is important to determine the impact of the impressions created by typeface".<ref>Henderson et al., 60, 71.</ref> Their research also shows "that individual differences [in typeface] can affect attentiveness to aesthetics", or the pleasing effect of the form or document.<ref>Henderson et al., 71.</ref>
The ''Font Shop'' professionals also have a warning concerning typeface and its impression on readers. They recommend "[avoiding] the embarrassment of typographic rejection by first determining the likes and dislikes of your target audience".<ref>
Additionally, Jo Mackiewicz recommends technical communicators consider typefaces that are both legible and readable. Her research has shown that legible typefaces have "the quality of being decipherable and recognizable" and are important "in situations where people are scanning pages, reading signs, or skimming through catalogs or lists".<ref name=mackiewicz118/> One example of a legible typeface is [[Univers]], while an illegible typeface example would be Snap ITC.<ref name=mackiewicz119>Mackiewicz (2004), 119.</ref> On the other hand, typefaces that are readable have: "the quality of giving ‘visual comfort,’ which is especially important in long stretches of text".<ref name=mackiewicz118/> Mackiewicz uses [[Times New Roman]] as an example of an easily read typeface while [[
===Serif vs. Sans Serif===
One aspect of typeface selection to consider is whether or not to use [[serif]] or [[Sans-serif|sans serif]] typefaces. Serif typefaces are "based on the carvings of the ancient Romans" and "feature small ‘feet’ at the end of the letterforms".<ref name=myt12>
===Electronic Selection===
Line 175 ⟶ 174:
===Potential Technical Problems===
In a study done by professionals from multiple companies and universities, family medical practices administered surveys on paper forms and electronically.<ref>Galliher et al., 154.</ref> However, the team could not accurately judge the advantage of the electronic form because of problems with the firewall and
===Tailoring Information to Federal Regulations===
Sometimes, there are external restrictions on a form or document that could affect the design process. Rita Tomlin, a freelance writer and instructor at San Diego State University, investigates the implications of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations on medical writing.<ref>Tomlin, 289, 310.</ref> Tomlin says,
== Notes ==
{{Reflist|
== References ==
*Blythe, Stuart.
*Brumberger, Eva.
*Chaparro, Barbara S., A. Dawn Shaikh, Alex Chaparro, and Edgar C. Merkle.
*
*Farkas, David K.
*Galliher, James M., Thomas V. Stewart, Paramod K. Pathak, James J. Werner, L. Miriam Dickinson, and John M. Hickner.
*Goldsborough, Reid.
*Harvey, Gillian.
*Henderson, Pamela W., Joan L. Giese, and Joseph A. Cote.
*Jansen, Carel. "Document Design." ''South African Journal of Linguistics'' 17, no. 4 (November 1999): 234-255.
*Lentz, Leo, and Henk Pander Maat.
*Mackiewicz, Jo.
*Mackiewicz, Jo.
*
*Power, Richard, Nadjet Bouayad-Agha, and Donia Scott.
*Sless, David.
*Tomlin, Rita C.
*Turton, Michael.
*
*Wroblewski, Luke.
[[Category:Technical communication]]
|