Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Introduction to... Elliott Smith: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:03, 10 February 2022

Latest revision as of 14:21, 13 April 2022

Line 12:

while it has been covered by numerous notable publications, I feel the article doesn't establish the importance or significance that would make it worthy of an article. '''[[User:Lachlan Foley|Lachlan Foley]]''' ([[User talk:Lachlan Foley|talk]]) 07:12, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

*'''Comment''' - I'm a bit confused by your nomination. Are you suggesting it has received [[WP:GNG|significant coverage in multiple reliable sources]] but fails inclusion guidelines for some other reason? [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">111</fontspan>''']] 08:12, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

*'''Proceedural keep'''. How the article is currently written isn't really a reason to delete in and of itself. There are multiple sources out there that show notability, such as Metacritic showing 11 reviews for the album. If an article isn't fleshed out enough, flesh it out. If you really believe that the article would be better merged into the main article for Elliott Smith, then it would be better to propose a merge and hash it out there. [[WP:MERGE]] gives a good set of directions on how to start proposing a merger. AfD isn't really a good venue for this particular album. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (｡◕‿◕｡)</span>''']] 14:29, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Albums and songs|list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)</small>