Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scriptural reasoning: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:25, 3 February 2022

Latest revision as of 06:06, 14 April 2022

Line 39:

:: Point proven. Moving on.... <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 22:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' the article sucks, but we have at least one book on the subject by a major scholar in Biblical hermeneutics published by a major academic publisher - ''David F. Ford, "An Interfaith Wisdom: Scriptural Reasoning between Jews, Christians and Muslims" in David F. Ford and C.C. Pecknold, The Promise of Scriptural Reasoning (Malden, MA / Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006)'' that alone means an article is possible.--[[User:Scott MacDonald|Scott Mac (Doc)]] 23:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' - As noted by the creator of this article, sources which are not third party do not count. The book you just described, as noted by the creator, is obviously affiliated with the subject matter, and therefore does not count as a source, or grounds for notability.— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<fontspan colorstyle="Greencolor:green;">Dæ</fontspan>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]^{[[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<fontsup colorstyle="Greencolor:green;">Contribs</fontsup>]]}''' 23:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

:* However, as I mentioned above, there are plenty of books findable not by David Ford. In addition, Ford's books are ''real'' books published by academic presses like Oxford University Press, not Lulu-published stuff to be dismissed as sources. [[User:Gordonofcartoon|Gordonofcartoon]] ([[User talk:Gordonofcartoon|talk]]) 20:40, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

*'''delete''' No unaffiliated sources provided means no notability.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 00:30, 21 February 2009 (UTC)