Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/System of Systems Integration: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 14:
Non-notable US Army bureaucratic procedures with no third party references. Article creator removed {{tlx|proposed deletion}} tags on both with no rationales or article improvement. <span style='font:1.0em "Apple Garamond","Adobe Garamond Pro",Garamond,serif;color:#369;'>[[User:DoriSmith|Dori]] ☾[[User talk:DoriSmith|Talk]] ⁘ [[Special:Contributions/DoriSmith|Contribs]]☽</span> 04:27, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Military|list of Military-related deletion discussions]]. <span style='font:1.0em "Apple Garamond","Adobe Garamond Pro",Garamond,serif;color:#369;'>[[User:DoriSmith|Dori]] ☾[[User talk:DoriSmith|Talk]] ⁘ [[Special:Contributions/DoriSmith|Contribs]]☽</span> 04:37, 31 May 2012 (UTC)<!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small>
*'''Comment''': it appears to be a cut and paste copy (down to the typo in "fi elding") of http://www.bctmod.army.mil/SoSI/sosi.html. As it's US army stuff perhaps not copyvio (I leave that to a US copyright expert), but certainly plagiarism. [[User:PamD|<
:::certainly plagiarism, but unquestionably US-PD, or I would have speedy deleted it. I think I might support a new rule that a copy of substantial paraphrase of a n official page about an organization is evidence of promotionalism sufficient for deletion. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 08:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' This is not a process, rather, it's a directorate within the US Army command chain. The problem is that it's just one piece within the labyrinthine acquisition process within the US DoD, so it's difficult to determine its notabilty. [[User:Roodog2k|Roodog2k]] ([[User talk:Roodog2k|talk]]) 13:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
| |||